Table 3.

Impacts on program components (percent, unless otherwise noted)

Program component	Treatment mean	Control mean	Impact	p-Value	Adjusted p-value	Sample size
In previous 12 months, exposed to information on
Relationships	18.16	20.82	− 2.66	0.680	0.997	221
Parenting	65.58	44.76	20.81**	0.010	0.025	220
Child health care	56.75	52.66	4.10	0.614	0.992	221
Education related services	29.37	28.80	0.57	0.930	1.000	220
Career Counseling or job training	18.94	22.03	− 3.09	0.624	0.993	220
Methods of birth control	82.71	67.31	15.41*	0.022	0.062	217
Percent correct on assessments of knowledge of contraception
Condoms	58.84	61.08	− 2.24	0.470	0.867	220
Birth control pills	46.22	55.08	− 8.86	0.049	0.103	220
IUDs	35.33	34.88	0.45	0.904	1.000	220
Other methods	37.06	36.70	0.36	0.923	1.000	220

Treatment and control group means are regression adjusted. Impacts on binary outcomes are estimated using the linear probability model, with standard errors adjusted to account for heteroskedasticity. All regressions include an indicator for parental status at baseline, indicators for race and ethnicity, educational enrollment, age at random assignment, and all available baseline measures of outcome variables. All p-values are based on a two-sided test, and adjusted p-values control for the familywise error rate using the method in Hothorn et al. (2008). Sample sizes differ across outcomes due to missing outcome data. Source: Baseline survey and 12 month follow-up survey

^*Significantly different from zero at the .10 level after adjusting for multiple comparisons, two-tailed test

^**Significantly different from zero at the .05 level after adjusting for multiple comparisons, two-tailed test

^***Significantly different from zero at the .01 level after adjusting for multiple comparisons, two-tailed test