Table 5.
Program component | Treatment mean | Control mean | Impact | p-Value | Adjusted p-value | Sample size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In previous 12 months, exposed to information on | ||||||
Relationships | 20.33 | 18.54 | 1.80 | 0.737 | 1.000 | 221 |
Parenting | 64.67 | 45.73 | 18.94 | 0.005 | 0.027 | 220 |
Child health care | 53.93 | 55.61 | − 1.68 | 0.803 | 1.000 | 221 |
Education related services | 27.69 | 30.55 | − 2.86 | 0.643 | 0.997 | 220 |
Career Counseling or job training | 17.05 | 23.98 | − 6.93 | 0.208 | 0.730 | 220 |
Methods of birth control | 80.04 | 70.05 | 9.99 | 0.092 | 0.416 | 217 |
Percent correct on assessments of knowledge of contraception | ||||||
Condoms | 59.58 | 60.31 | − 0.73 | 0.826 | 0.999 | 220 |
Birth control pills | 47.98 | 53.26 | − 5.28 | 0.183 | 0.504 | 220 |
IUDs | 36.70 | 33.46 | 3.24 | 0.357 | 0.790 | 220 |
Other methods | 37.02 | 36.75 | 0.27 | 0.939 | 1.000 | 220 |
Treatment and control group means are regression adjusted. Impacts on binary outcomes are estimated using the linear probability model, with standard errors adjusted to account for heteroskedasticity. Regressions control only for treatment status and randomization stratum. All p-values are based on a two-sided test, and adjusted p-values control for the familywise error rate using the method in Hothorn et al. (2008). Sample sizes differ across outcomes due to missing outcome data. Source: Baseline survey and 12 month follow-up survey
*Significantly different from zero at the .10 level after adjusting for multiple comparisons, two-tailed test
**Significantly different from zero at the .05 level after adjusting for multiple comparisons, two-tailed test
***Significantly different from zero at the .01 level after adjusting for multiple comparisons, two-tailed test