Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;24(Suppl 2):105–118. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02968-6

Table 5.

Impacts on program components, excluding controls for baseline characteristics but including controls for randomization strata (percent, unless otherwise noted)

Program component Treatment mean Control mean Impact p-Value Adjusted p-value Sample size
In previous 12 months, exposed to information on
 Relationships 20.33 18.54 1.80 0.737 1.000 221
 Parenting 64.67 45.73 18.94 0.005 0.027 220
 Child health care 53.93 55.61 − 1.68 0.803 1.000 221
 Education related services 27.69 30.55 − 2.86 0.643 0.997 220
 Career Counseling or job training 17.05 23.98 − 6.93 0.208 0.730 220
 Methods of birth control 80.04 70.05 9.99 0.092 0.416 217
Percent correct on assessments of knowledge of contraception
 Condoms 59.58 60.31 − 0.73 0.826 0.999 220
 Birth control pills 47.98 53.26 − 5.28 0.183 0.504 220
 IUDs 36.70 33.46 3.24 0.357 0.790 220
 Other methods 37.02 36.75 0.27 0.939 1.000 220

Treatment and control group means are regression adjusted. Impacts on binary outcomes are estimated using the linear probability model, with standard errors adjusted to account for heteroskedasticity. Regressions control only for treatment status and randomization stratum. All p-values are based on a two-sided test, and adjusted p-values control for the familywise error rate using the method in Hothorn et al. (2008). Sample sizes differ across outcomes due to missing outcome data. Source: Baseline survey and 12 month follow-up survey

*Significantly different from zero at the .10 level after adjusting for multiple comparisons, two-tailed test

**Significantly different from zero at the .05 level after adjusting for multiple comparisons, two-tailed test

***Significantly different from zero at the .01 level after adjusting for multiple comparisons, two-tailed test