Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 14;50(10):1785–1812. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01317-5

Table 4.

Results from sensitivity analyses with data from studies categorised as “high” or “moderate” in quality

Sensitivity analysis Analysis details Effect size Between study variance Intraclass correlation Probability of small effect
Between group: oral contraceptive pill withdrawal versus the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle 22 effect sizes from 9 studies 0.12 [− 0.24–0.43] 0.18 [0.01–0.61] 0.63 [0.0–0.88] (d ≥ 0.2; p = 0.281; d ≤  − 0.2; p = 0.041)
Between group: oral contraceptive pill consumption versus all phases of the menstrual cycle except the early follicular phase 60 effect sizes from 15 studies 0.14 [− 0.09 to 0.33] 0.22 [0.05–0.48] 0.10 [0.0–0.55] (d ≥ 0.2; p = 0.282; d ≤  − 0.2; p = 0.006)
Within group: oral contraceptive pill consumption with oral contraceptive pill withdrawal 89 effect sizes from 16 studies 0.03 [− 0.06 to 0.10] 0.04 [0.0–0.16] 0.38 [0.0–0.69] (|d|≥ 0.2; p < 0.001)

Results are from multilevel random effects models with median parameter estimates and 95% credible intervals (95% CrI)

H high, M moderate, L low, VL very low