Table 2.
Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for risk of bias assessment of cohort studies included in the meta-analysis
| Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Overall | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of exposed cohort | Selection of non-exposed | Ascertainment of exposure | Outcome not present at start | Assessment of outcome | Adequate follow-up length | Adequacy of follow-up | |||
| Chu-Hsu Lin 2016 [19] | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
| Wojciech Pluskiewicz 2016 [20] | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
| Nadia Afrin 2016 [21] | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
| Nadia Afrin 2018 [22] | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
| B. Drozdzowska 2013 [23] | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
| Yuksel Ersoy 2009 [24] | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
| F. Hita-Contreras 2013 [25] | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
| Kerri M. Winters-Stone 2011 [26] | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | 6 |
| Shawna Follis 2018 [27] | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
| Kaisa M. Randell 2001 [28] | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 9 |
| Abdulrahim A. Rouzi 2015 [29] | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 9 |
★, score of 1; ★★, score of 2; ☆, score of 0