Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;20(5):961–982. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00813-5

Table 3.

Feedback-locked ERP latencies across Inflation Steps 1–8 and per forecasting condition

Successful inflations Bubble bursts
Inflation step number ERPs in response to negative forecasting ERPs in response to positive forecasting ERPs in response to negative forecasting ERPs in response to positive forecasting
P2 N1 P3a P3b P2 N1 P3a P3b P2 N1 P3a P3b P2 N1 P3a P3b
1 131 (10.80) 178 (8.59) 263 (12.97) 408 (23.02) 129 (12.65) 179 (8.35) 267 (14.39) 395 (20.79)
2 132 (8.87) 175 (7.45) 261 (16.45) 385 (16.36) 133 (9.39) 173 (8.80) 262 (16.82) 393 (22.68) 131 (10.22) 172 (7.67) 341 (45.51) 571 (55.29) 129 (11.40) 173 (6.31) 337 (43.66) 567 (54.45)
3 130 (10.60) 174 (8.01) 263 (13.70) 391 (20.61) 126 (9.87) 175 (8.09) 264 (11.71) 395 (23.51) 130 (10.64) 177 (7.08) 339 (37.08) 568 (38.15) 124 (12.59) 175 (5.88) 336 (46.78) 565 (49.13)
4 130 (11.47) 175 (6.96) 267 (15.41) 390 (17.06) 131 (9.17) 175 (8.41) 266 (18.04) 383 (17.96) 129 (14.40) 174 (7.21) 341 (33.85) 574 (31.70) 127 (12.28) 173 (6.74) 356 (31.14) 543 (38.36)
5 135 (8.00) 172 (7.66) 269 (18.67) 384 (21.80) 131 (10.91) 173 (6.13) 265 (16.06) 391 (23.77) 129 (9.74) 172 (4.83) 347 (30.44) 564 (45.32) 130 (11.40) 171 (5.76) 345 (35.61) 583 (59.14)
6 127 (9.66) 174 (5.66) 265 (18.89) 392 (23.22) 133 (10.37) 174 (7.09) 263 (17.05) 390 (20.40) 123 (14.24) 172 (7.49) 348 (27.19) 568 (45.85) 123 (14.23) 175 (7.77) 340 (29.03) 571 (45.59)
7 127 (13.94) 172 (5.75) 264 (20.12) 397 (24.90) 127 (12.94) 172 (6.56) 262 (13.13) 385 (18.91) 122 (13.57) 173 (5.88) 338 (26.73) 564 (38.11) 128 (8.79) 172 (6.51) 335 (33.84) 574 (51.63)
8 124 (24.33) 169 (6.39) 260 (19.96) 387 (18.91) 127 (12.21) 166 (6.29) 255 (20.91) 391 (23.22) 127 (10.31) 170 (7.28) 339 (21.67) 569 (42.22) 125 (11.28) 169 (6.25) 341 (24.10) 558 (46.68)

Note. Mean latency (in ms) and standard deviation (SD) as directly extracted from BrainVision Analyzer. The first inflation never led to a bubble burst (see text)