Skip to main content
. 2020 May 27;36(10):1985–1996. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01895-5

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The reference values of RVFW-GLS and its gender- and age-related differences. a Gender- and age-related difference of RVFW-GLS. Gender-related difference of RVFW-GLS was found in G41–60 and G61–80 groups, and age-associated difference wasn’t detected in each gender subgroup. *P < 0.05: significant difference between males and females in the same age subgroup. b The correlation between age and RVFW-GLS. There was no correlation between age and RVFW-GLS since Spearman correlation coefficient (r) resulted as − 0.031 (P = 0.703)