Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;7(1):e000399. doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2020-000399

Table 3.

Biosecurity measures related to vehicles and equipment in 124 farms in Spain

n (%)
Shared feeder wagon
 No 48 (38.7)
 Yes 76 (61.3)
Mean (median; Q1–Q3*) number of entries of the feeder wagon per week, when shared 7.1 (7; 7–7)
Shared machinery (tractors, wagons, cistern, slurry whisk, baler or others)
 No 60 (47.5)
 Yes 64 (52.5)
Shared manure vehicle
 No 103 (80.1)
 Yes 21 (18.9)
Mean (median; Q1–Q3) number of entries of the manure vehicle per month, when shared 0.39 (0.17; 0.12–0.54)
Shared materials (ear tag applicators, calving materials, cleaning materials, harvesting materials or others)
 No 100 (80.3)
 Yes 24 (19.7)
Shared slurry vehicle
 No 82 (66.2)
 Yes 42 (33.8)
Mean (median; Q1–Q3) number of entries of the slurry vehicle per month, when shared 0.33 (0.08; 0.08–0.60)
 Carcase deposit area
 Outside farm perimeter 27 (20.5)
 Inside farm perimeter 97 (79.5)
Mean (median; Q1–Q3) number of entries of the carcase vehicle per month inside the farm perimeter (when applicable) 0.34 (0.17; 0.12–0.51)
Vehicle (slaughter/feedlot) may arrive carrying animals from outside the farm
 No 5 (3.3)
 Not known 5 (4.1)
 Yes 114 (92.6)
Vehicles (slaughter/feedlot) may enter inside farm perimeter
 No 6 (4.9)
 Yes 118 (95.1)
Mean (median; Q1–Q3) number of entries of the slaughter/feedlot vehicle per month inside farm perimeter 2.6 (2; 1.5–5.3)

*Q1: 25th percentile; Q3: 75th percentile.