Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;41(10):995–1004. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001254

Table 5.

PET/computed tomography versus diffusion-weighted imaging

PET/CT DWI
First author Site Analysis Sensitivity (%; 95 CIs) Specificity (%; 95 CIs) Accuracy (%; 95 CIs) Sensitivity (%; 95 CIs) Specificity (%; 95 CIs) Accuracy (%; 95 CIs)
Heusner All L 95 99 98 86 67 71
Heusner All C 94 99 98 91 72 76
Catalano All P 75 84
Rezk All L 85 86 85 82 78 81
Ergul Axillary LNs P 67 89 75 40 100 63
Heusner Regional LNs P 75 100 93 75 64 67
Rezk Regional LNs L 90 82 84 73
Grankvist Bone L 100 100 67A–70B 40B–95A
Heusner Bone P 100 100 100 86 8 35
Heusner Distant LNs P 100 100 100 100 0 30
Rezk Distant LNs L 86 92 83 80
Heusner Lung P 100 100 100 100 100 100
Heusner Liver P 100 100 100 100 82 85
Rezk Distant lesions L 84 84 80 81
Heusner Other organs P 100 94 95 66 94 89
Heusner Organs C 100 98 99 87 75 77

A, STIR and DWI with and without T1; B, DWI only; C, compartment level; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; L, lesion level; LNs, lymph nodes; P, patient level; STIR, short tau inversion recovery.