Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;34(3):248–253. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000365

TABLE 1.

MoCA Test and Classification Accuracies for 30 Different ADCs When Applying the Optimal Threshold of 23

Prevalence N0 N1 Sp Se NPV PPV
1 0.216 91 25 0.912 0.76 0.933 0.704
2 0.223 94 27 0.830 0.741 0.918 0.556
3 0.283 198 78 0.909 0.91 0.963 0.798
4 0.293 256 106 0.879 0.774 0.904 0.726
5 0.298 139 59 0.921 0.712 0.883 0.792
6 0.325 129 62 0.899 0.806 0.906 0.794
7 0.330 77 38 0.844 0.711 0.855 0.692
8 0.364 49 28 1.000 0.464 0.766 1.000
9 0.369 123 72 0.675 0.889 0.912 0.615
10 0.371 107 63 0.897 0.794 0.881 0.820
11 0.373 151 90 0.775 0.744 0.836 0.663
12 0.375 70 42 0.914 0.500 0.753 0.778
13 0.429 20 15 0.600 0.867 0.857 0.619
14 0.450 105 86 0.762 0.756 0.792 0.722
15 0.465 76 66 0.829 0.909 0.913 0.822
16 0.478 93 85 0.903 0.812 0.840 0.885
17 0.543 37 44 0.919 0.500 0.607 0.880
18 0.561 43 55 1.000 0.691 0.717 1.000
19 0.620 68 111 0.882 0.847 0.779 0.922
20 0.620 30 49 0.900 0.755 0.692 0.925
21 0.622 96 158 0.740 0.816 0.710 0.838
22 0.635 38 66 0.895 0.773 0.694 0.927
23 0.733 40 110 0.950 0.791 0.623 0.978
24 0.737 31 87 0.903 0.701 0.519 0.953
25 0.762 35 112 0.771 0.902 0.711 0.927
26 0.765 43 140 0.907 0.586 0.402 0.953
27 0.821 63 288 0.889 0.781 0.471 0.970
28 0.825 7 33 1.000 0.455 0.280 1.000
29 0.849 21 118 0.810 0.669 0.304 0.952
30 0.870 49 327 0.959 0.847 0.485 0.993

N0, N1: sizes of the samples of patients without and with CI.

ADCs indicates Alzheimer Disease Centers; CI, cognitive impairment; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity.