Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;85(5):2938–2944. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b02530

Table 1. Enantioselective Allylic–allylic Alkylation Using 3,5-Dimethyl-4-nitroisoxazole 1 as a Vinylogous Pronucleophile: Optimization Studiesa.

graphic file with name jo9b02530_0005.jpg

entry solvent (catalyst) T [°C] yield [%]b erc
1 CH2Cl2 (5a) rt 26 60:40
2 CH2Cl2(5b) rt 22 81:19
3 CH2Cl2 (5c) rt <5 nd
4 CH2Cl2 (5d) rt 22 79:21
5 CH2Cl2 (5e) rt 41 88:12
6 CH2Cl2 (5f) rt 43 90:10
7 CH2Cl2 (5g) rt 38 76:24
8 CHCl3 (5f) rt 69 91:9
9 ClCH2CH2Cl (5f) rt 40 86:14
10 toluene (5f) rt 19 89:11
11 THF (5f) rt 36 87:13
12 CH3CN (5f) rt 80 89:11
13d CHCl3 (5f) rt 41 89:11
14e CHCl3 (5f) rt 66 90:10
15 CHCl3 (5f) 10 20 92:8
16 CHCl3 (5f) 40 84 96:4
17 CHCl3 (5f) 60 78 90:10
18f CHCl3 (5f) 40 81 91:9
19g CHCl3 (5f) 40 79 93:7
a

Reactions performed on a 0.1 mmol scale using 1 (1 equiv) and 2a (1 equiv) in 0.4 mL of the solvent.

b

Isolated yields are given.

c

Determined by a chiral stationary phase HPLC.

d

Reaction was performed in 0.8 mL of CH2Cl2.

e

Reaction was performed in 0.2 mL of CH2Cl2.

f

Reaction was performed using 1 (1.5 equiv).

g

Reaction was performed using 2a (1.5 equiv).