Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;231(6):670–678. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.768

Table 2.

Applicant Survey Results

Topic, question Response, n (%)
Feasibility Extremely easy Somewhat easy Neither easy nor difficult Somewhat difficult Extremely difficult
 Interaction with program director 10 (59) 6 (35) 1 (6) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Interaction with faculty 11 (65) 3 (18) 1 (6) 2 (12) 0 (0)
 Interaction with fellow 11 (65) 4 (24) 0 (6) 2 (12) 0 (0)
Appropriateness of remote interview Far exceeded expectations Exceeded expectations Equals expectations Short of expectations Far short of expectations
 Overall expectation of virtual interview 1 (6) 8 (47) 6 (35) 2 (12) 0 (0)
None A little Moderate A lot A great deal
 Effect of lack of in–person interaction 2 (12) 10 (59) 2 (12) 2 (12) 1 (6)
 Effect of lack of physically seeing program/institution 7 (41) 5 (29) 4 (24) 1 (6) 0 (0)
Acceptability of remote interview Extremely satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neutral Somewhat dissatisfied Extremely dissatisfied
 Overall satisfaction 14 (82) 2 (12) 1 (6) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Extremely useful Very useful Moderately useful Slightly useful Not at all useful
 Usefulness of 1 min warning 5 (29) 7 (41) 2 (12) 3 (18) 0 (0)
 Usefulness of overview 3 (18) 9 (53) 2 (12) 2 (12) 1 (6)
Great Manageable Too Many
 Number of prompts throughout day in transitions back and forth during interviews 4 (24) 2 (12) 11 (65) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Attitude toward and experience with remote interview
Extremely positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Extremely negative
 General attitude towards remote platform prior to this interview 4 (27) 3 (20) 6 (40) 2 (13) 0 (0)
Yes No
 Recommendation of virtual platform for interview 13 (76) 4 (24)
0 1 2–4 5
 Number of prior remote interviews 1 (7) 2 (13) 4 (27) 8 (53)
Much better Somewhat better Same Somewhat worse Much worse
 Comparative experience between this zoom interview and prior experiences 1 (6) 11 (69) 4 (25) 0 (0) 0 (0)