Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;58:102290. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102290

Table 4.

Mediating effect test for H1 to H3.

Hypothesis path Standard error Estimates Bias-corrected 95% CI
Percentile 95% CI
Results
Lower Upper Lower Upper
H1: Brand authenticity→Awakening of interest→Brand experience .049 .466*** .377 .576 .365 .560 Support
H2a: Brand authenticity→Brand experience→Customers-brand identification .029 .785*** .716 .834 .722 .837 Support
H2b: Awakening of interest→Brand experience→Customers-brand identification .061 .541*** .416 .662 .413 .655 Support
H3c: Brand experience→Customers-brand identification→In-personal WOM .022 .845*** .799 .883 .800 .884 Support
H3d: Brand experience→Customers-brand identification→E-WOM .021 .837*** .790 .872 .793 .874 Support

*P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.