Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 15;2(9):e0198. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000198

Table 1.

A Comparison of Inline Positive End-Expiratory PressureValves Options for Differential multiventilation Systems

Types Adjustable Inline PEEP Valve Modified PEEP Valve With Collar Inline PEEP Valve Enclosure With Commercial PEEP Valve
Construction Commercial 3D-printed components 3D-printed components Commercial Components 3D-printed components
Pros  Made for purpose  Requires minimal sourcing of supplies  Requires minimal sourcing of supplies  Uses commercial PEEP valves  Requires minimal sourcing of supplies
 Food and Drug Administration approved
 Valves are easily serviced and replaced
 Does not require an intact supply chain  Manufacturer PEEP settings/indicators intact  Uses commercial PEEP valves
 Manufacturer PEEP setting/indicators can be kept intact (transparent enclosures only)
 Manufacturer PEEP setting/indicators can be kept intact (transparent enclosures only)
 Convenient form-factor
Cons  Not available in most countries  No indicated PEEP settings (must be measured)  Leaks at higher postvalve pressures (due to manufacturer-provided cap design)  Requires sourcing of multiple parts  Fully 3D printed designs do not permit simple visualization of PEEP valve setting.
 Rarely stocked in hospitals  Printed spring strength may decrease over time at high settings  Requires epoxy and/or sealant  Nonprinted enclosures often involve more complicated assembly  Function of bottle-based design dependant on matching local bottle shape (varies by country) to 3D printed base
 Requires intact supply chain at time of surge
 Expensive  Requires permanent modification of commercial valves

PEEP = positive end-expiratory pressure.