Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;48(16):e93. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa568

Table 3.

F 1 score, R-squared values and number of predicted genera. For all three analysed mock communities, we inserted the F1 score (twice the ratio between the product of recall and precision and their sum), the R2 value of the linear fit performed between estimated and true abundances together with the number of predicted genera, Inline graphic, with various taxonomic methods. The true number of genera is G = 7 for each community

Mock 1 (G = 7) Mock 2 (G = 7) Mock 3 (G = 7)
F 1 score R 2 Inline graphic F 1 score R 2 Inline graphic F 1 score R 2 Inline graphic
Shotgun Core-Kaiju 0.92 0.97 6 0.92 0.96 6 0.92 0.71 6
Standard Kaiju 0.02 0.97 674 0.03 0.98 501 0.02 0.94 738
MetaPhlAn2 0.86 0.46 7 0.86 0.60 7 0.86 0.08 7
Kraken2 0.04 0.98 333 0.05 0.99 266 0.04 0.96 378
16S DADA2 + SILVA 0.48 0.59 18 0.41 0.73 22 0.6 0.41 13
DADA2 + GG 0.5 0.45 17 0.43 0.60 21 0.63 0.35 12
DADA2 + RDP 0.48 0.59 18 0.4 0.73 23 0.6 0.41 13
QIIME2 + SILVA 0.21 0.50 41 0.21 0.59 41 0.21 0.43 41
QIIME2 + GG 0.26 0.46 32 0.26 0.50 32 0.25 0.36 33