Table 1.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers and Tailored Exemplars of Implementation Strategies Mapped to CFIR Barriers
CFIR Domain | Constructs (Examples) | Examples of Barriers to CRC Screening | Examples of Mitigating Implementation Strategies |
---|---|---|---|
Intervention characteristics | Intervention source, adaptability, complexity, cost | Colonoscopy is perceived to be complex and time consuming12 | Provide mailed CRC screening tests with step-by-step instructions13 |
Inner setting: features of the implementing organization | Networks and communications, culture, implementation climate | Low PCP-to-GI referral rates14 | Develop clinical reminders for providers15 Audit provider performance and provide feedback13 |
Outer setting: external context or environment | Knowledge of patient needs and resources, peer pressure, external policies and incentives | Inadequate public transportation12 | Provide bus passes or travel vouchers. |
Characteristics of individuals: clinicians and other staff within the implementing organization | Providers’ knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, self-efficacy, individual stage of change | Clinicians are not confident that they can appropriately choose between/council about CRC screening modalities16 | Provide technical assistance16 |
Implementation process | Planning, engaging, executing, reflecting and evaluating an intervention | Implementation barriers to CRC screening are not routinely assessed17 | Use external coaching to help providers assess and address implementation barriers 17 |
NOTE. where existing studies have used implementation strategies that may address stated barriers, these are provided and cited. Where such examples are not available, a hypothetical example is provided.
CFIR, consolidated framework for implementation research; CRC, colorectal cancer; GI, gastroenterologist; PCP, primary care provider.