Table 2.
uMARS subscale ratings.
| Subscale | Score |
|---|---|
| App objective quality | M (SD); min–max |
| A. Engagement | 3.6 (0.47); 2.8–4.6 |
| B. Functionality | 3.9 (0.49); 3–4.8 |
| C. Aesthetics | 4.1 (0.66); 3–5 |
| D. Information | 4.1 (0.66); 3–5 |
| Overall objective quality | 3.8 Good (0.46); 3.1–4.8 |
| App Subjective Quality | Rating (score) |
| Recommend the app to others | Probably (4) |
| Predicted frequency of use of app in next year | 3–10 (3) |
| Willing to pay for the app | Probably not (2) |
| Overall star rating | • • • • (4/5 stars) |
| Perceived impact of app (N = 26) | M (SD); min–max |
| Awareness | 3.9 (0.72); 2–5 |
| Knowledge | 3.8 (0.90); 2–5 |
| Attitudes | 3.9 (0.93); 2–5 |
| Intention to change | 3.6 (0.90); 1–5 |
| Help-seeking | 3.9 (0.74); 2–5 |
| Behavior change | 4.0 (0.96); 1–5 |
| Mean perceived impact for all factors | Moderate impact (4) |