TABLE 2.
Statistically significant differences in bacterial taxa between PD patients versus healthy controlsa
Phylum | Family | Genus | ↓/↑b | MDc | PD (%)d | HC (%)d | P value | FDR- adjusted P valuee |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Firmicutes |
Thermoanaerobacterales Incertae sedis |
Caldicellulosiruptor | ↑ | 0.226 | 0.121 | 0.058 | 0.010 | 0.014 |
Veillonellaceae | Veillonella | ↑ | 0.599 | 1.994 | 0.277 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Clostridiaceae | Clostridium | ↑ | 0.169 | 3.133 | 2.154 | 0.012 | 0.016 | |
Streptococcaceae | ↑ | 0.526 | 1.737 | 0.155 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Streptococcus | ↑ | 0.513 | 1.730 | 0.153 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Eubacteriaceae | ↑ | 0.287 | 0.120 | 0.062 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Acetobacterium | ↑ | 0.273 | 0.115 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Lachnospiraceae | ↓ | −0.253 | 8.000 | 12.460 | 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
Anaerostipes | ↑ | −0.406 | 0.236 | 0.144 | 0.027 | 0.030 | ||
Blautia | ↓ | −0.243 | 3.778 | 5.928 | 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
Lachnospira | ↓ | −0.444 | 0.535 | 1.086 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Butyrivibrio | ↓ | −0.655 | 0.021 | 0.113 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Roseburia | ↓ | −0.668 | 1.066 | 1.777 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Pseudobutyrivibrio | ↓ | −0.562 | 0.160 | 0.444 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Coprococcus | ↓ | −0.409 | 0.522 | 0.954 | 0.003 | 0.005 | ||
Bacteroidetes | ↓ | −0.269 | 28.546 | 47.455 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Bacteroidaceae | ↓ | −0.297 | 17.454 | 29.910 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Bacteroides | ↓ | −0.297 | 17.454 | 30.383 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Odoribacteriaceae | Odoribacter | ↓ | −0.432 | 0.191 | 0.331 | 0.001 | 0.002 | |
Porphyromonadaceae | Parabacteroides | ↓ | −0.245 | 1.858 | 2.269 | 0.046 | 0.050 | |
Rikenellaceae | ↑ | 1.460 | 0.112 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Sphingobacteriaceae | ↓ | −0.177 | 1.045 | 1.471 | 0.044 | 0.049 | ||
Proteobacteria | ↑ | 0.177 | 10.548 | 6.542 | 0.020 | 0.023 | ||
Desulfovibrionaceae | Desulfovibrio | ↑ | 0.278 | 0.293 | 0.245 | 0.020 | 0.023 | |
Desulfohalobiaceae | ↑ | 0.355 | 0.185 | 0.123 | 0.002 | 0.003 | ||
Desulfonauticus | ↑ | 0.304 | 0.184 | 0.122 | 0.002 | 0.003 | ||
Sutterellaceae | Sutterella | ↓ | −0.643 | 0.258 | 0.819 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Alcaligenaceae | ↓ | −0.642 | 0.270 | 0.837 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Comamonadaceae | ↓ | −0.440 | 0.045 | 0.127 | 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
Enterobacteriaceae | Enterobacter | ↑ | 0.559 | 0.404 | 0.173 | 0.001 | 0.002 | |
Escherichia | ↑ | 1.003 | 3.737 | 0.259 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Serratia | ↑ | 1.011 | 0.672 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Klebsiella | ↓ | −0.723 | 0.668 | 0.961 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
“Candidatus Blochmannia” |
↓ | −1.673 | 0.042 | 1.392 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Actinobacteria | ↑ | 0.313 | 5.524 | 2.263 | 0.002 | 0.003 | ||
Bifidobacteriaceae | ↑ | 0.362 | 4.191 | 1.289 | 0.014 | 0.018 | ||
Bifidobacterium | ↑ | 0.356 | 4.173 | 1.288 | 0.016 | 0.020 | ||
Coriobacteriaceae | ↑ | 0.240 | 0.944 | 0.562 | 0.012 | 0.016 | ||
Slackia | ↑ | 0.309 | 0.309 | 0.158 | 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
Microbacteriaceae | ↑ | 0.441 | 0.677 | 0.333 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Brevibacteriaceae | ↓ | 0.288 | 0.072 | 0.121 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Brevibacterium | ↓ | −0.288 | 0.072 | 0.120 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Verrucomicrobia | ↑ | 0.614 | 5.429 | 1.020 | 0.002 | 0.003 | ||
Verrucomicrobiaceae | ↑ | 0.629 | 5.396 | 1.009 | 0.006 | 0.008 | ||
Akkermansia | ↑ | 0.464 | 4.669 | 0.879 | 0.015 | 0.019 | ||
Prosthecobacter | ↑ | 0.511 | 0.133 | 0.022 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Cyanobacteria | ↓ | −0.156 | 0.509 | 0.730 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Aphanizomenonaceae | Dolichospermum | ↓ | −1.152 | 0.009 | 0.391 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
The results were obtained by Mann-Whitney U test performed on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0, followed by the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction test for multiple comparisons.
↓, Significantly reduced in PD patients; ↑, significantly increased in PD patients.
MD, mean difference between the logarithmic value of relative abundance in the PD and HC groups.
Average relative abundance (as a percentage) of each taxon in the PD and HC groups.
FDR-corrected P values with FDR < 0.05.