TABLE 2.
Mediation analysis results for Study 2.
Dependent variables |
||||||
Regression 1 Perceived betrayal |
Regression 2 Attitude change |
|||||
B | t | p | B | t | p | |
Intercept | 5.0093 | 28.0023 | <0.0001 | -0.2381 | -0.4324 | 0.6664 |
Transgression type [X] | 0.0926 | 0.3660 | 0.7151 | 0.3438 | 1.2732 | 0.2057 |
Brand biography [W] | -0.2075 | -0.8349 | 0.4057 | 0.9194 | 3.4558 | 0.0008 |
X × W | 1.2396 | 3.5110 | 0.0007 | 0.9431 | 2.3711 | 0.0195 |
Perceived betrayal [M] | 0.2866 | 2.7790 | 0.0065 | |||
Regression model | F(3, 107) = 12.33, p = 0.0007 R2 = 0.2441 | F(4, 106) = 28.23, p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.7182 |
Transgression type (1 = ethical vs. 0 = functional); Brand biography (1 = underdog brand vs. 0 = top-dog brand).