TABLE 3.
Mediation analysis results for Study 4.
Dependent variables |
||||||
Regression 1 Perceived betrayal |
Regression 2 Attitude change |
|||||
B | t | p | B | t | p | |
Intercept | 5.5250 | 18.0080 | <0.0001 | −0.3421 | −0.6237 | 0.5341 |
Transgression type [X1] | −0.6750 | −1.5557 | 0.1226 | −0.7542 | −1.8867 | 0.0618 |
Transgression type [X2] | −0.3837 | −0.9146 | 0.3623 | −0.2727 | −0.7103 | 0.4790 |
Brand biography [W] | 0.5821 | 1.3579 | 0.1772 | 2.1103 | 5.3564 | 0.0000 |
X1 × W | −2.0637 | −3.3611 | 0.0011 | −1.4732 | −2.5103 | 0.0135 |
X2 × W | −0.7529 | −1.2272 | 0.2223 | −1.2024 | −2.1358 | 0.0349 |
Perceived betrayal [M] | 0.3394 | 3.9753 | 0.0001 | |||
Regression model | F(5, 114) = 8.79, p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.5274 | F(6, 113) = 18.72, p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.7060 |
Transgression type (X1, X2) = [autonomy {0, 0}, community {1, 0}, functional {0, 1}]; Brand biography (1 = underdog brand vs. 0 = top-dog brand).