Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 4;11:1988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01988

TABLE 3.

Mediation analysis results for Study 4.

Dependent variables
Regression 1 Perceived betrayal
Regression 2 Attitude change
B t p B t p
Intercept 5.5250 18.0080 <0.0001 −0.3421 −0.6237 0.5341
Transgression type [X1] −0.6750 −1.5557 0.1226 −0.7542 −1.8867 0.0618
Transgression type [X2] −0.3837 −0.9146 0.3623 −0.2727 −0.7103 0.4790
Brand biography [W] 0.5821 1.3579 0.1772 2.1103 5.3564 0.0000
X1 × W −2.0637 −3.3611 0.0011 −1.4732 −2.5103 0.0135
X2 × W −0.7529 −1.2272 0.2223 −1.2024 −2.1358 0.0349
Perceived betrayal [M] 0.3394 3.9753 0.0001
Regression model F(5, 114) = 8.79, p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.5274 F(6, 113) = 18.72, p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.7060

Transgression type (X1, X2) = [autonomy {0, 0}, community {1, 0}, functional {0, 1}]; Brand biography (1 = underdog brand vs. 0 = top-dog brand).