Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;10:15285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71866-2

Table 3.

The comparison of the performance of Ag@Sep-N–CH with some other catalysts.

Entry Catalyst Solvent catalyst loading Temp. (°C) Yield (%) References
1 Ag@Sep-N–CH H2O:EtOH 0.03 g 50 95 This work
2 Nano-ZnO 10 mol% 100 Trace 21
3 Fe2(SO4)3.7H2O 10 mol% 120 86 35
4 Fe3O4@SiO2–SO3H 0.05 g 110 97 22
5 Silica-bonded S-sulfonic acid (SBSSA) EtOH 0.03 g Reflux 98 23
6 Nano-NiO 10 mol% 100 Trace 21
7 Barium Perchlorate EtOH 15 mol% Reflux 95 36
8 Nano titania-supported sulfonic acid (n-TSA) 0.013 g 90 91 21