Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 9;53:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.01.003

Table 4.

Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) from nested models examining associations between nSES, education, and all-cause mortality among men diagnosed with prostate cancer, San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles County 1997–2003.

Cases Follow-up Deaths Model 1a: Base Model1 + tumor and treatment factors Model 2: Model 1 + nativity, comorbidities, health behaviorsb, and hospital SES Model 3: Model 2 + Restaurant Environment Indexc Model 4: Model 2 + Retail Food Environment Indexd




n Person-years n HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Models include nSES variable only (not education)
nSES quintiles
Q1, lowest 277 2177 106 1.75 (1.27–2.41) 1.64 (1.18–2.29) 1.60 (1.13–2.27) 1.56 (1.10–2.23)
Q2 269 2225 95 1.37 (1.02–1.83) 1.28 (0.95–1.73) 1.25 (0.91–1.72) 1.24 (0.90–1.70)
Q3 284 2377 91 1.46 (1.10–1.93) 1.44 (1.08–1.91) 1.43 (1.05 – 1.94) 1.43 (1.05–1.93)
Q4 340 3109 104 1.22 (0.95–1.57) 1.17 (0.91–1.51) 1.15 (0.88–1.51) 1.16 (0.89–1.51)
Q5, highest 624 6007 160 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference
p-trend < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 0.02
Models include education variable only (not nSES)
Education
High school or less 669 5473 255 1.46 (1.18–1.82) 1.44 (1.15–1.81) 1.42 (1.13–1.79) 1.41 (1.12–1.78)
Some college 516 4611 154 1.14 (0.90–1.44) 1.12 (0.88–1.43) 1.12 (0.88–1.43) 1.11 (0.87–1.42)
College graduate or more 615 5861 148 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference
p-trend < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Models include separate nSES and education variables
nSES quintiles
Q1, lowest 277 2177 106 1.56 (1.11–2.19) 1.47 (1.04 – 2.08) 1.44 (1.00–2.06) 1.41 (0.98–2.03)
Q2 269 2225 95 1.26 (0.93–1.71) 1.18 (0.87 – 1.61) 1.16 (0.83–1.60) 1.16 (0.84–1.59)
Q3 284 2377 91 1.34 (1.01–1.80) 1.33 (0.99–1.78) 1.32 (0.96–1.80) 1.32 (0.97–1.80)
Q4 340 3109 104 1.16 (0.90–1.50) 1.11 (0.86–1.45) 1.10 (0.83–1.44) 1.11 (0.85–1.44)
Q5, highest 624 6007 160 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference
p-trend 0.02 0.05 0.08 0.10
Education
High school or less 669 5473 255 1.32 (1.05–1.67) 1.33 (1.04–1.68) 1.33 (1.04–1.69) 1.32 (1.04–1.68)
Some college 516 4611 154 1.07 (0.84–1.36) 1.07 (0.83–1.37) 1.08 (0.84–1.38) 1.07 (0.83–1.37)
College graduate or more 615 5861 148 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference
p-trend 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Models include joint education/nSES variable
Education/nSESe,f
High school or less/Low nSES 465 3650 173 1.64 (1.27–2.12) 1.60 (1.23–2.09) 1.58 (1.19–2.08) 1.57 (1.18–2.08)
High school or less/High nSES 203 1814 82 1.48 (1.14–1.92) 1.48 (1.14–1.92) 1.47 (1.13–1.92) 1.47 (1.12–1.92)
Some college or more/Low nSES 365 3129 119 1.39 (1.07–1.80) 1.37 (1.05–1.78) 1.36 (1.03–1.79) 1.35 (1.02–1.78)
Some college or more/High nSES 761 7302 182 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference 1.00 reference

nSES, neighborhood socioeconomic status; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Body type indicates statistical significance

1

Base model: adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and study location; stage-stratified; and census block group-adjusted.

a

Tumor factors significantly associated with survival in the base model with p < 0.05 were 1st subsequent tumor/time to 1st subsequent tumor and histologic grade. Treatment associated with survival in the base model with p < 0.05 included surgery.

b

Health behaviors associated with survival in the base model with p < 0.05 were BMI, smoking, and physical activity.

c

The Restaurant Environment Index is the ratio of the number of fast food restaurants compared to the number of other restaurants within the residential buffer. Cases with residential buffers with no businesses were included in the ‘0’ category.

d

The Retail Food Environment Index is the ratio of the number of convenience stores, liquor stores, and fast food restaurants compared to the number of supermarkets and farmers markets within the residential buffer. Cases with residential buffers with no businesses were included in the ‘0’ category.

e

Low nSES (Q1–Q3), high SES (Q4–Q5).

f

Synergy Index (SI): Model 3 SI, 2.74; 95% CI, 2.42–3.06 and Model 4 SI, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.21–2.94.