Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 15;11(37):3420–3431. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27707

Table 3. Stratification analysis for ER negative and PR negative associations between selected IL-12 signaling SNPs and BC risk in Puerto Rican women (n = 80).

Gene SNP Genetic model P value unstratified Crude OR stratified (95% CI) P value Adjusted OR stratified1(95% CI) P value Adjusted OR stratified2(95% CI) P value
IL12RB1 rs401502 Recessive 0.009 2.92 (1.08–7.19) 0.02 3.54 (1.28–9.04) 0.01 4.14 (1.35–11.82) 0.009
STAT4 rs3024896 Dominant 0.07 0.58 (0.37–0.99) 0.05 0.58 (0.32–1.00) 0.06 0.47 (0.22–0.92) 0.04
Additive 0.08 0.59 (0.35–0.95) 0.04 0.59 (0.34–0.97 0.05 0.46 (0.23–0.86) 0.02
rs3821236 Dominant 0.08 0.59 (0.36–0.95) 0.03 0.59 (0.55–0.97) 0.04 0.62 (0.34–1.11) 0.11
IFNG rs2069705 Additive 0.30 1.34 (0.95–1.90) 0.09 1.45 (1.01–2.09) 0.04 1.48 (0.97–2.26) 0.07
Recessive 0.29 1.79 (0.97–3.18) 0.05 2.15 (1.15–3.91) 0.01 2.35 (1.14–4.66) 0.02

OR: Odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; ER: Estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; neg: negative. 1Adjusted for Age and Educational level; 2Adjusted for Age, Educational level, ERT and Breastfeeding duration.