Table 3.
Between-subject correlations of stimulation differences (compared with no stimulation) between peak load force rates and perceptual estimates
| aIPS |
LO |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light |
Heavy |
Light |
Heavy |
|||||
| Dynamic | Static | Dynamic | Static | Dynamic | Static | Dynamic | Static | |
| Peak LFR | –0.50 (–0.81 to 0.02) |
–0.18 (–0.64 to 0.36) |
0.37 (–0.18 to 0.74) |
0.13 (–0.41 to 0.61) |
–0.56* (–0.83 to –0.07) |
0.14 (–0.40 to 0.61) |
–0.18 (–0.64 to 0.36) |
–0.59* (–0.85 to –0.12) |
Between-subject correlations [R values: mean (95% confidence intervals)] of stimulation differences (compared with no stimulation) between peak load force rates (peak LFR) and perceptual estimates. z-Scored variables were averaged over object order, to obtain values for light and heavy objects, and differences with respect to no stimulation [transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)no] were calculated for TMSdynamic and TMSstatic separately. aIPS, anterior intraparietal sulcus; LO, lateral occipital cortex.
*
P < 0.05.