Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 11;4(3):036107. doi: 10.1063/5.0002898

TABLE IV.

The pharmacologically induced changes in stress relaxation and recovery fitting constants. Each treatment was compared with its pretreatment control using paired t-tests (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).

ΔTbase (μN) Relaxation Recovery
Δk1 (%) Δk2 (%) Δτ (%) Δβ (%) Δ|k1| (%) Δτ (%) Δβ (%) ΔTf-I (μN)
Noco (N = 24) 3.7 ± 0.4 (***) 40 ± 9 (***) 37 ± 9 (***) 10 ± 12 11 ± 5 96 ± 14 (***) 87 ± 25 (**) −7 ± 4 (*) 0.03 ± 0.07
DMSO (N = 21) −0.1 ± 0.2 6 ± 6 8 ± 7 4 ± 9 8 ± 8 10 ± 9 5 ± 13 8 ± 5 0.17 ± 0.09
Bleb (N = 16) −2.8 ± 0.5 (***) −27 ± 7 (**) −15 ± 5 (*) 14 ± 10 −2 ± 9 −32 ± 5 (***) −27 ± 8 (**) 7 ± 4 −0.1 ± 0.06
CytoD (N = 8) −5.0 ± 0.4 (***) −74 ± 10 (***) −47 ± 12 (***) −112 ± 6 (***) −0.1 ± 0.1
TX (N = 7) −8.8 ± 0.8 (***) −86 ± 6 (***) −65 ± 7 (**) −109 ± 10 (***) −0.1 ± 0.2