Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Aug 8;140(4):595–597. doi: 10.1007/s00401-020-02208-9

WNT-activated embryonal tumors of the pineal region: ectopic medulloblastomas or a novel pineoblastoma subgroup?

Anthony PY Liu 1, Loudy P Priesterbach-Ackley 2, Brent A Orr 3, Bryan K Li 4,5,6, Brian Gudenas 7, Roel E Reddingius 8, Mariona Suñol 9, Cinzia E Lavarino 10, Nagore G Olaciregui 10, Vicente Santa-Maria Lopez 11, Michael J Fisher 12, Lili-Naz Hazrati 13, Eric Bouffet 4, Annie Huang 4,5,6,14, Giles W Robinson 1, Pieter Wesseling 2,8, Paul A Northcott 7, Amar Gajjar 1
PMCID: PMC7501206  NIHMSID: NIHMS1619049  PMID: 32772175

Pineoblastoma (PB) is a CNS embryonal tumor of childhood with propensity to metastasize and a 5-year overall survival of 61% [5]. Originating from the pineal gland, PBs carry molecular profiles distinct from medulloblastomas (MBs), the most frequent embryonal tumors that by definition are located in the posterior fossa [2]. Based on methylation profiling, independent studies have identified biologically and clinically relevant subgroups in PB, driven by discrete genomic alterations [4, 5, 7]. In addition to tumors comprising these bona fide PB subgroups, rare outliers have anecdotally been described. Here, we present a multi-institutional series of patients (n=7) with WNT-activated embryonal tumors epicentered at the pineal region, including three unreported patients and four that had been briefly described [4, 5, 8]. Findings from DNA methylation array, tumor sequencing, and immunohistochemistry were reported. Clustering and copy-number analysis of methylation profiles were performed as previously described, adopting a radiographically and molecularly verified in-house cohort of MB and PB as reference [5].

Among the 7 patients, 4 were male, and the median age of diagnosis was 15 years (Supplementary Table 1). MRI revealed tumor centering at the pineal gland in 5 patients, and the posterior aspect of the thalamus abutting the third ventricle in 2 (Fig. 1a). No posterior fossa lesion was present. Six of the patients had localized disease, while 1 had a metastatic focus at the internal auditory canal (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Three patients underwent gross or near-total resection, 1 had subtotal resection and 3 had biopsy. Histology of all tumors were compatible with CNS embryonal tumors. Surprisingly, methylation profiling revealed that 6 samples clustered with WNT-activated medulloblastoma (MB-WNT), while 1 sample had no matching entity (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2a). Monosomy 6 was observed in 3 patients and 6q loss in 1 (Supplementary Fig 2b). Tumor sequencing revealed missense mutations in exon 3 of CTNNB1 in all samples (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1). Orthogonal validation by immunohistochemistry (n=4) confirmed nuclear beta-catenin accumulation and positive LEF1 staining, indicative of WNT-pathway activation (Fig. 1d). All patients underwent adjuvant treatment based on regimens for CNS embryonal tumors (Supplementary Table 1). In particular, craniospinal irradiation without primary site boost was delivered in 2 patients (Patients 4, 5), reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation (23.4Gy) and boost in 1 (Patient 3), and focal radiotherapy in 1 (Patient 2). At median follow-up of 3 years (range: 0.8-12.8), all patients were alive without disease (n=5) or with stable residual disease (n=2). Rapid response to treatment was observed in patients who received biopsy only rendering second-look surgery unnecessary (Supplementary Fig. 1b).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Diagnostic MRI (mid-sagittal, axial) depicting the presence of pineal region tumors. (b) t-SNE representation of methylation profiles demonstrates clustering of 6/7 study samples with WNT-activated medulloblastoma (MB-WNT). (c) Summary of CTNNB1 mutations in study samples with reference to those identified in MB-WNT (PeCan database, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital). (d) Histopathologic features by H&E staining and immunohistochemistry (120x, scale bar=120μm), showing small cell embryonal tumor, nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin in a proportion of tumor cells, and diffuse positive staining for LEF1. MB-G3, Group 3 medulloblastoma; MB-G4, Group 4 medulloblastoma; MB-SHH, SHH-activated medulloblastoma; PB, pineoblastoma (subgroup annotation according to Liu et al. [5]); Pin-WNT, pineal region tumors with WNT-activation

Activation of the WNT-pathway is implicated in the initiation and propagation of cancers [1]. The exact mechanism leading to pathway overactivity and corresponding prognostic significance is disease-specific. Mutations in exon 3 of CTNNB1 that disturb physiological phosphorylation and degradation of CTNNB1, represent a hallmark feature of MB-WNT, and in turn a predictor for good outcome [3]. Analogous to the pathogenesis of MB-WNT from the lower rhombic lip [6], the anatomical-molecular profile of tumors in our report might be the result of CTNNB1 mutations transforming neural stem cells in the pineal region and/or third ventricle subventricular zone. Overlapping DNA methylation signatures and immunohistochemical patterns with WNT-activated MBs may suggest that the definition of MB needs to be adapted to reflect rare pineal region diagnoses. Overall, our study demonstrates that adequate molecular work-up of pineal region tumors is invaluable to detect tumor drivers of prognostic significance, and may allow de-escalation of therapy in an appropriate subset of patients.

Supplementary Material

401_2020_2208_MOESM2_ESM

Supplementary Figure 1. (a) MR image highlighting the solitary focus of metastasis in the right internal auditory canal of patient 7 (white arrow). (b) End of treatment (patients 4 and 5) and on-therapy (patient 6) MR images of patients who underwent biopsy only at diagnosis showing satisfactory treatment response.

401_2020_2208_MOESM3_ESM

Supplementary Figure 2. (a) Hierarchical clustering confirms the epigenomic similarities among our study samples and WNT-activated medulloblastoma (MB-WNT). (b) Composite profiles depicting copy-number variations in WNT-activated pineal tumors and medulloblastomas. MB-G3, Group 3 medulloblastoma; MB-G4, Group 4 medulloblastoma; MB-SHH, SHH-activated medulloblastoma; PB, pineoblastoma (subgroup annotation according to Liu et al. [5])

401_2020_2208_MOESM1_ESM

Supplementary Table 1. Clinical, radiographic, molecular characteristics and outcome of patients with WNT-activated embryonal tumors of the pineal region.

Acknowledgments

Funding

Funding was provided by American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities and National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Grant (P30CA021765).

Footnotes

Data availability

Data from methylation profiling are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  • 1.Anastas JN, Moon RT (2013) WNT signalling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer 13: 11–26 Doi 10.1038/nrc3419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Capper D, Jones DT, Sill M, Hovestadt V, Schrimpf D, Sturm D, Koelsche C, Sahm F, Chavez L, Reuss DE (2018) DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature 555: 469–474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gibson P, Tong Y, Robinson G, Thompson MC, Currle DS, Eden C, Kranenburg TA, Hogg T, Poppleton H, Martin J et al. (2010) Subtypes of medulloblastoma have distinct developmental origins. Nature 468: 1095–1099 Doi 10.1038/nature09587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li BK, Vasiljevic A, Dufour C, Yao F, Ho BLB, Lu M, Hwang EI, Gururangan S, Hansford JR, Fouladi M et al. (2020) Pineoblastoma segregates into molecular sub-groups with distinct clinico-pathologic features: a Rare Brain Tumor Consortium registry study. Acta Neuropathologica 139: 223–241 Doi 10.1007/s00401-019-02111-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu APY, Gudenas B, Lin T, Orr BA, Klimo P, Kumar R, Bouffet E, Gururangan S, Crawford JR, Kellie SJ et al. (2020) Risk-adapted therapy and biological heterogeneity in pineoblastoma: integrated clinico-pathological analysis from the prospective, multi-center SJMB03 and SJYC07 trials. Acta Neuropathologica 139: 259–271 Doi 10.1007/s00401-019-02106-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pei Y, Brun SN, Markant SL, Lento W, Gibson P, Taketo MM, Giovannini M, Gilbertson RJ, Wechsler-Reya RJ (2012) WNT signaling increases proliferation and impairs differentiation of stem cells in the developing cerebellum. Development 139: 1724–1733 Doi 10.1242/dev.050104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pfaff E, Aichmüller C, Sill M, Stichel D, Snuderl M, Karajannis MA, Schuhmann MU, Schittenhelm J, Hasselblatt M, Thomas C et al. (2020) Molecular subgrouping of primary pineal parenchymal tumors reveals distinct subtypes correlated with clinical parameters and genetic alterations. Acta Neuropathologica 139: 243–257 Doi 10.1007/s00401-019-02101-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Priesterbach-Ackley LP, Boldt HB, Petersen JK, Bervoets N, Scheie D, Ulhøi BP et al. (2020) Brain tumour diagnostics using a DNA methylation-based classifier as a diagnostic support tool. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 46:478–492. 10.1111/nan.12610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

401_2020_2208_MOESM2_ESM

Supplementary Figure 1. (a) MR image highlighting the solitary focus of metastasis in the right internal auditory canal of patient 7 (white arrow). (b) End of treatment (patients 4 and 5) and on-therapy (patient 6) MR images of patients who underwent biopsy only at diagnosis showing satisfactory treatment response.

401_2020_2208_MOESM3_ESM

Supplementary Figure 2. (a) Hierarchical clustering confirms the epigenomic similarities among our study samples and WNT-activated medulloblastoma (MB-WNT). (b) Composite profiles depicting copy-number variations in WNT-activated pineal tumors and medulloblastomas. MB-G3, Group 3 medulloblastoma; MB-G4, Group 4 medulloblastoma; MB-SHH, SHH-activated medulloblastoma; PB, pineoblastoma (subgroup annotation according to Liu et al. [5])

401_2020_2208_MOESM1_ESM

Supplementary Table 1. Clinical, radiographic, molecular characteristics and outcome of patients with WNT-activated embryonal tumors of the pineal region.

RESOURCES