Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 22;20(3):243–252. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.07.006

Table 2.

Multivariate multinomial logistic regression results for loneliness cluster among young adults, TYP 2000-2017 (N = 2,289).

Loneliness Cluster/Class Contrast
RRR (95%)/Ref = Emotional Loners
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Serious Emotional Loners Severe Emotional & Social Loners Serious Emotional Loners Severe Emotional & Social Loners Serious Emotional Loners Severe Emotional & Social Loners
Individual characteristics in early adolescence (at aged 15)
Adverse adolescence experience (AAE) 1.07 (0.98, 1.17) 1.42 (1.23, 1.63)*** 1.05 (0.95, 1.15) 1.38 (1.20, 1.60)*** 1.04 (0.94, 1.15) 1.36 (1.18, 1.57)**
Early maturation (ref = Others) 1.27 (0.96, 1.68)§ 1.19 (0.79, 1.79) 1.27 (0.97, 1.66)§ 1.19 (0.79, 1.79) 1.22 (0.94, 1.60) 1.12 (0.73, 1.71)
Short sleep (ref = Others) 1.06 (0.84, 1.34) 0.77 (0.55, 1.09) 1.03 (0.82, 1.29) 0.75 (0.53, 1.06) § 1.04 (0.82, 1.32) 0.77 (0.54, 1.09)



Feeling of loneliness
 During middle school 1.66 (1.38, 1.98)*** 2.27 (1.72, 3.00)*** 1.41 (1.18, 1.68)*** 1.91 (1.41, 2.60)*** 1.32 (1.10, 1.57)** 1.72 (1.26, 2.36)***
 During high school 1.91 (1.61, 2.27)*** 1.98 (1.40, 2.81)*** 1.69 (1.42, 2.02)*** 1.62 (1.11, 2.37)*
 During college 1.67 (1.37, 2.02)*** 2.45 (1.63, 3.67)***



Covariates
Age 0.99 (0.89, 1.09) 1.04 (0.90, 1.21) 1.02 (0.92, 1.13) 1.08 (0.93, 1.24) 1.01 (0.91, 1.11) 1.06 (0.93, 1.22)
Male 0.99 (0.85, 1.15) 0.98 (0.71, 1.37) 1.04 (0.89, 1.23) 1.04 (0.75, 1.44) 1.06 (0.90, 1.26) 1.07 (0.77, 1.47)
Attendance at a 4-year college 0.69 (0.54, 0.87)*** 0.64 (0.41, 1.00)* 0.66 (0.52, 0.83)*** 0.62 (0.39, 0.96)* 0.63 (0.50, 0.81)** 0.58 (0.37, 0.91)*
Being an only child 0.82 (0.53, 1.26) 0.47 (0.20, 1.14)§ 0.78 (0.50, 1.22) 0.45 (0.19, 1.10)§ 0.72 (0.46, 1.16) 0.42 (0.17, 1)*
Parental educational level 1.05 (0.98, 1.14)§ 1.15 (1.00, 1.32)* 1.04 (0.96, 1.13) 1.14 (0.99, 1.30)§ 1.05 (0.96, 1.14) 1.14 (0.99, 1.32)§
Residence during early adolescence (ref = Taipei City)
 Taipei county 0.89 (0.70, 1.13) 0.92 (0.71, 1.18) 0.89 (0.70, 1.14) 0.92 (0.72, 1.18) 0.89 (0.70, 1.13) 0.92 (0.72, 1.18)
 Yilan county 0.90 (0.66, 1.22) 0.84 (0.61, 1.16) 0.89 (0.66, 1.20) 0.83 (0.61, 1.14) 0.89 (0.65, 1.22) 0.85 (0.60, 1.20)

Note: RRR = relative risk ratio; CI = confidence interval; All models adjust for sample clusters; §p <  .10; *p <  .05; **p <  .01; ***p < .001.