Table 2.
Relationship between resilience capacity and working and sociodemographic variables
Variable | Resilience capacity |
Point estimates | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very low n (%) |
Moderate to moderately low n (%) | Moderately high to high n (%) |
|||
Professional category | χ2 18.27 | 0.00‡ | |||
Physicians | 6 (6.98) | 60 (69.76) | 20 (23.26) | ||
Nurses | 24 (15.58) | 104 (67.54) | 26 (16.88) | ||
Nursing assistants | 15 (18.75) | 36 (45) | 29 (36.25) | ||
Sex | 0.01‡ | ||||
Female | 41 (15.65) | 154 (58.78) | 67 (25.77) | χ2 8.60 | |
Male | 4 (6.9) | 46 (79.31) | 8 (13.79) | ||
Performance area | 0.04‡ | ||||
Hospital emergency service | 44 (46.06) | 167 (60.94) | 63 (23) | χ2 6.29 | |
Emergency mobile units | 1 (2.17) | 33 (71.74) | 12 (26.09) | ||
Nurses | |||||
Hospital emergency service | 23 (17.56) | 90 (68.7) | 18 (13.74) | χ2 7.49 | 0.02‡ |
Emergency mobile units | 1 (4.35) | 14 (60.87) | 8 (34.78) | ||
Nursing assistants | |||||
Not night shifts | 9 (50) | 6 (33.33) | 3 (16.66) | χ2 16.63 | <0.001‡ |
Including night shifts | 5 (8.33) | 30 (50) | 25 (41.66) | ||
Physicians | |||||
Age | 35.5∗; SD 8.68 95% CI 26.38, 44.62 |
44.54∗; SD 7.25 95% CI 42.62, 46.47 |
42.16∗; SD 9.65 95% CI 37.50, 46.81 |
F 3.59 | 0.03§ |
Length of service | 2.25†; SD 6.23 95% CI –1.64, 11.44 |
9.25†; SD 6.61 95% CI 8.96, 12.47 |
5.58†; SD 8.44 95% CI 3.37, 11.51 |
χ2 8.74 | 0.01¶ |
CI, confidence interval.
Mean
Median
Chi-square test
Analysis of variance
Kruskal-Wallis test