Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 21;51(3):1351–1366. doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-01904-z

Table 8.

Comparison of the results with state of the art CNN methods using X-ray images

Reference Task No of images Method Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Precision F1 Score
Narin et al. [8] COVID-19 50 ResNet-50 98
Normal 50
Hemdan et al. [9] COVID-19(+) 90 COVIDX-Net 90
Normal 25
Khan et al. [10] COVID-19 284 CoroNet 89.5 97 100
Maghdid et al. [12] COVID-19 85 AlexNet 94.1
Razzak et al. [14] COVID-19 200 DL 98.75
Abbas et al. [15] COVID-19 105 DCNN 95.12 97.91 91.87 93.36
Afshar et al. [16] COVID-19 1668 COVID-CAPS 95.7 90 95.8
Farook et al. [19] COVID-19 68 COVID-Net 96.23
Ghoshal et al. [33] COVID-19 70 CNN 92.9
Wang et al. [34] COVID-19 45 CNN 83.5
Bac.Pneu* 931
Vir.Pneu# 660
Zhang et al. [35] COVID-19 70 ResNet 96.6 70.7
Ioannis et al. [36] COVID-19 224 VGG-19 93.48
Pneumonia 700
Normal 504
Sethy et al. [37] COVID-19 (+) 25 ResNet-50 + SVM 95.38
COVID-19(−) 25
Ozturk et al. [38] COVID-19(+) 125 DarkCovidNet 98.8
No findings 500
COVID-19(+) 125 87.02
Pneumonia 500
No findings 500
Proposed COVID-19 1000 OptCoNet 97.78 97.75 96.25 92.88 95.25
Normal 900
Pneumonia 900

*Bacterial Pneumonia, # Virus Pneumonia