Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;13:1756284820954114. doi: 10.1177/1756284820954114

Table 2.

Base-case results of the cost-effectiveness analysis.

Colon cancer burdena
LYs per treated patient (years)
QALYs per treated patient (years)
Costs per treated patient (€)
Incremental NMBb ICER in €/QALY (quadrant)
Recurrences Deaths Undiscounted Discounted Undiscounted Discounted Undiscounted Discounted
CAPOX
 6-month strategy 369 316 9.09 8.05 7.60 6.71 43,328 41,257 Reference Reference
 3-month strategy 369 316 9.09 8.05 7.60 6.80 39,640 37,645 8454 −37,308 (SE)c
FOLFOX
 6-month strategy 369 316 9.09 8.05 7.60 6.71 49,301 47,135 Reference Reference
 3-month strategy 457 393 8.36 7.43 6.99 6.19 46,632 44,389 −23,189 5293 (SW)
a

Total during the lifetime of a cohort of 1000 treated patients.

b

At a willingness to pay of €50,000/QALY

c

ICER indicates that the 3-month strategy is more effective and less costly compared with 6 months. In other words, you save €37,308 to gain 1 QALY.

CAPOX, capecitabine plus oxaliplatin; FOLFOX, fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; LYs, life-years; NMB, net monetary benefit; QALYs, quality-adjusted life-years; SE, the strategy is located in the southeast quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane, indicating that a strategy is less costly and more effective compared with the reference strategy; SW, the strategy is located in the southwest quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane, indicating that a strategy is less costly and less effective compared with the reference strategy.