Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;6(3):269–277. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.04.004

Table 6.

Estimation of diversity within different gut segments after enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4 (K88+) challenge in weaned pigs.

Item Treatments1
SEM2 P-value
PC NC FA P1 P2
Ileum
 Chao 182 210 203 216 253 44.8 0.85
 Observed species 119 144 154 144 199 43.5 0.77
 Shannon 2.04 1.14 2.29 1.60 2.55 0.58 0.48
 Simpson 0.55 0.29 0.48 0.42 0.78 0.12 0.12
Cecum
 Chao 342a 310a 324a 335a 253b 19.4 0.04
 Observed species 277a 256ab 257ab 271a 199b 16.6 0.04
 Shannon 5.47 5.38 4.84 5.11 4.60 0.30 0.25
 Simpson 0.96 0.95 0.89 0.92 0.89 0.03 0.28
Colon
 Chao 393a 396a 329b 341ab 311b 22.1 0.06
 Observed species 323a 310ab 270bc 277abc 257c 17.0 0.08
 Shannon 5.89a 5.89a 4.95b 5.13ab 4.98b 0.27 0.05
 Simpson 0.96 0.97 0.89 0.92 0.90 0.02 0.20

a,b,cDifferent superscripts within a row indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05).

1

PC, non-challenged positive control; NC, enterotoxigenic E. coli F4 (K88+)-challenged (on d 7) negative control; FA, NC + kitasamycin at 50 mg/kg + olaquindox at 100 mg/kg + regular free acids at 5 g/kg; P1, NC + kitasamycin at 50 mg/kg + olaquindox at 100 mg/kg + micro-encapsulated combination of organic acids and essential oils at 1 g/kg; P2, NC + kitasamycin at 50 mg/kg + olaquindox at 100 mg/kg + micro-encapsulated combination of organic acids and essential oils at 2 g/kg.

2

SEM means standard error of the means (n = 4).