Table 1.
Multiplicative effect | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Level of observation | Parameter | Level | Number | Estimate; 95% CIb | P | Overall P c |
Veterinarian | MI skills | Poor_untrained | 18 | Ref | 0.06 | |
Poor_trained | 6 | 0.99; 0.70 to 1.40 | 0.97 | |||
Near moderate | 6 | 1.07; 0.77 to 1.50 | 0.68 | |||
Moderate | 6 | 1.55; 1.12 to 2.10 | <0.01 | |||
Gender | Male | 2 | Ref | |||
Female | 32 | 0.91; 0.61 to 1.40 | 0.67 | |||
VHHM experience | ⩽5 years | 22 | Ref | |||
>5 years | 14 | 1.08; 0.85 to 1.40 | 0.53 | |||
Vet type | Animal health vet | 13 | Ref | |||
General practitioner | 23 | 0.89; 0.69 to 1.10 | 0.35 | |||
Gender concordance | No | 124 | Ref | |||
Yes | 46 | 1.20; 0.98 to 1.50 | 0.08 | |||
Consultancy | Sufficient time | No | 34 | Ref | ||
Yes | 136 | 1.04; 0.83 to 1.30 | 0.73 | |||
Number of clients | One | 150 | Ref | |||
Multiple | 20 | 0.99; 0.72 to 1.30 | 0.94 | |||
Visit type | Strategic | 38 | Ref | 0.06 | ||
Herd health problem | 30 | 0.69; 0.50 to 0.95 | 0.02 | |||
Other | 102 | 0.81; 0.63 to 1.00 | 0.07 | |||
Client | Age | Continuous (decades) | 1.01; 0.93 to 1.10 | 0.79 | ||
Education | Lower | 104 | Ref | |||
Higher | 66 | 0.96; 0.79 to 1.20 | 0.64 | |||
Role | Owner | 133 | Ref | |||
Employee | 37 | 1.00; 0.78 to 1.30 | 0.99 | |||
Satisfied | No | 2 | Ref | |||
with consultancy | Yes | 168 | 1.73; 0.65 to 4.60 | 0.27 |
SD of random intercept of veterinarian: 0.21 (standard error (SE): 0.079) and client (farm): 0.38 (SE: 0.052).
95% confidence interval.
Overall P-value for chi-square test for variables with more than two categories.