Table 2.
Multiplicative effect | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Level of observation | Parameter | Level | Number | Estimate; 95% CIb | P | Overall P c |
Veterinarian | MI skills | Poor_untrained | 18 | Ref | 0.51 | |
Poor_trained | 6 | 1.08; 0.71 to 1.60 | 0.73 | |||
Near moderate | 6 | 1.05; 0.72 to 1.50 | 0.80 | |||
Moderate | 6 | 1.35; 0.92 to 2.00 | 0.13 | |||
Gender | Male | 2 | Ref | Ref | ||
Female | 32 | 1.18; 0.72 to 1.90 | 0.52 | |||
VHHM experience | ⩽5 years | 22 | Ref | Ref | ||
>5 years | 14 | 1.17; 0.88 to 1.60 | 0.28 | |||
Vet type | Animal health vet | 13 | Ref | Ref | ||
General practitioner | 23 | 0.64; 0.47 to 0.86 | <0.01 | |||
Gender concordance | No | 124 | Ref | Ref | ||
Yes | 46 | 1.20; 0.89 to 1.60 | 0.23 | |||
Consultancy | Sufficient time | No | 34 | Ref | Ref | |
Yes | 136 | 0.84; 0.61 to 1.20 | 0.28 | |||
Number of clients | One | 150 | Ref | Ref | ||
Multiple | 20 | 0.90; 0.59 to 1.40 | 0.62 | |||
Visit type | Strategic | 38 | Ref | 0.22 | ||
Herd health problem | 30 | 0.67; 0.42 to 1.10 | 0.08 | |||
Other | 102 | 0.84; 0.61 to 1.20 | 0.29 | |||
Client | Age | Continuous (decades) | 1.12; 0.98 to 1.30 | 0.09 | ||
Education | Lower | 104 | Ref | Ref | ||
Higher | 66 | 1.15; 0.88 to 1.50 | 0.31 | |||
Role | Owner | 133 | Ref | Ref | ||
Employee | 37 | 1.23; 0.87 to 1.80 | 0.24 | |||
Satisfied | No | 2 | Ref | Ref | ||
with consultancy | Yes | 168 | 0.65; 0.22 to 2.00 | 0.45 |
SD of random intercept of veterinarian: 0.08(SE: 0.26) and client (farm): 0.55 (SE: 0.078).
95% confidenceinterval.
Overall P-value for chi-square test for variables with more than two categories.