Table 3.
Proportion of Change Talk | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratio | ||||||
Level of observation | Parameter | Level | Number | Estimate; 95% CIb | P | Overall P c |
Veterinarian | MI skills | Poor_untrained | 18 | Ref | 0.88 | |
Poor_trained | 6 | 0.93; 0.63 to 1.40 | 0.72 | |||
Near moderate | 6 | 1.02; 0.79 to 1.40 | 0.93 | |||
Moderate | 6 | 1.12; 0.79 to 1.60 | 0.51 | |||
Gender | Male | 2 | ||||
Female | 32 | 0.90; 0.56 to 1.40 | 0.65 | |||
VHHM experience | ⩽5 years | 22 | ||||
>5 years | 14 | 0.89; 0.68 to 1.20 | 0.38 | |||
Vet type | Animal health vet | 13 | ||||
General practitioner | 23 | 1.44; 1.09 to 1.90 | 0.01 | |||
Gender concordance | No | 124 | ||||
Yes | 46 | 1.02; 0.77 to 1.40 | 0.87 | |||
Consultancy | Sufficient time | No | 34 | |||
Yes | 136 | 1.26; 0.93 to 1.70 | 0.14 | |||
Number of clients | One | 150 | ||||
Multiple | 20 | 1.03; 0.68 to 1.60 | 0.89 | |||
Visit type | Strategic | 38 | Ref | 0.90 | ||
Herd health problem | 30 | 1.07; 0.69 to 1.70 | 0.75 | |||
Other | 102 | 0.98; 0.73 to 1.30 | 0.88 | |||
Client | Age | Continuous (decades) | 0.89; 0.79 to 1.00 | 0.06 | ||
Education | Lower | 104 | ||||
Higher | 66 | 0.86; 0.66 to 1.10 | 0.25 | |||
Role | Owner | 133 | ||||
Employee | 37 | 0.80; 0.58 to 1.10 | 0.18 | |||
Satisfied | No | 2 | ||||
with consultancy | Yes | 168 | 2.82; 0.95 to 8.40 | 0.06 |
SD of random intercept of veterinarian: <0.001 (SE: 0.44) and client (farm): 0.24 (SE: 0.12).
95% confidence interval.
Overall P-value for chi-square test for variables with more than two categories.