Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 7;9:e41. doi: 10.1017/jns.2020.34

Table 8.

mRNA levels of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism in the liver and muscles of fish fed with high-protein/low-carbohydrate (HP/LC) and low-protein/high-carbohydrate (LP/HC) diets before (36 wps) and after (41 wps) challenging them with the medium-carbohydrate diet (CHO-M) and the high-carbohydrate diet (CHO-H) for 4 weeks (mean ± sd, n 6)

Parameter tissue History (before challenge) HP/LC history LP/HC history P value1
HP/LC LP/HC P value CHO-M CHO-H CHO-M CHO-H History Diet Interactions
Liver glycolysis
 gck 0⋅5 ± 0⋅2 1⋅5 ± 0⋅8 0⋅027 0⋅9 ± 0⋅6 0⋅8 ± 0⋅3 0⋅7 ± 0⋅4 0⋅6 ± 0⋅2 0⋅259 0⋅569 0⋅947
 pfklr 1⋅2 ± 0⋅6 1⋅2 ± 0⋅9 0⋅888 0⋅7 ± 0⋅2a 0⋅4 ± 0⋅2b 0⋅3 ± 0⋅1b 0⋅3 ± 0⋅1b 0⋅009 0⋅057 0⋅046
 pklr 1⋅0 ± 0⋅3 1⋅5 ± 0⋅7 0⋅088 1⋅0 ± 0⋅6 0⋅8 ± 0⋅5 1⋅0 ± 0⋅6 0⋅6 ± 0⋅2 0⋅418 0⋅122 0⋅503
Liver gluconeogenesis
 g6pca1 1⋅4 ± 0⋅7 0⋅9 ± 0⋅6 0⋅226 0⋅8 ± 0⋅5 0⋅6 ± 0⋅4 0⋅6 ± 0⋅4 0⋅4 ± 0⋅2 0⋅176 0⋅176 0⋅937
 g6pca2 1⋅3 ± 1⋅0 0⋅6 ± 0⋅5 0⋅164 0⋅5 ± 0⋅3 0⋅4 ± 0⋅4 0⋅5 ± 0⋅3 0⋅2 ± 0⋅1 0⋅297 0⋅100 0⋅332
 pck1 0⋅7 ± 0⋅4 0⋅6 ± 0⋅3 0⋅617 0⋅08 ± 0⋅07 0⋅78 ± 0⋅90 0⋅03 ± 0⋅06 0⋅07 ± 0⋅14 0⋅055 0⋅064 0⋅093
 pck2 0⋅9 ± 0⋅5 0⋅4 ± 0⋅4 0⋅078 1⋅1 ± 0⋅7 0⋅5 ± 0⋅4 0⋅9 ± 0⋅6 0⋅6 ± 0⋅4 0⋅794 0⋅054 0⋅584
Liver lipogenesis
 fasn 0⋅7 ± 0⋅4 1⋅2 ± 0⋅6 0⋅158 0⋅5 ± 0⋅3 0⋅9 ± 0⋅8 0⋅4 ± 0⋅2 0⋅9 ± 0⋅3 0⋅979 0⋅018 0⋅636
 g6pd 1⋅0 ± 0⋅3 1⋅6 ± 0⋅6 0⋅056 0⋅5 ± 0⋅3 0⋅8 ± 0⋅3 0⋅3 ± 0⋅2 1⋅0 ± 0⋅4 0⋅768 0⋅001 0⋅180
Liver amino acid catabolism
 asat 1⋅3 ± 0⋅5 0⋅5 ± 0⋅3 0⋅049 0⋅6 ± 0⋅3 0⋅8 ± 0⋅4 0⋅5 ± 0⋅2 0⋅4 ± 0⋅3 0⋅046 0⋅727 0⋅311
 alat 1⋅3 ± 0⋅4 0⋅8 ± 0⋅4 0⋅048 1⋅4 ± 0⋅4 0⋅7 ± 0⋅4 0⋅7 ± 0⋅3 0⋅5 ± 0⋅3 0⋅005 0⋅007 0⋅137
 gdh 0⋅9 ± 0⋅3 1⋅4 ± 0⋅5 0⋅053 1⋅1 ± 0⋅3 0⋅8 ± 0⋅5 0⋅8 ± 0⋅3 0⋅6 ± 0⋅3 0⋅158 0⋅096 0⋅684
Glucose transport and Muscle metabolism
 glut4 0⋅7 ± 0⋅2 1⋅1 ± 0⋅5 0⋅152 0⋅8 ± 0⋅2ab 0⋅6 ± 0⋅3b 0⋅7 ± 0⋅4ab 1⋅4 ± 0⋅8a 0⋅060 0⋅157 0⋅030
 hk1 0⋅9 ± 0⋅2 1⋅5 ± 0⋅4 0⋅009 0⋅9 ± 0⋅3 1⋅0 ± 0⋅5 0⋅8 ± 0⋅3 1⋅4 ± 0⋅7 0⋅605 0⋅092 0⋅207
 hk2 1⋅0 ± 0⋅4 1⋅2 ± 0⋅2 0⋅250 1⋅2 ± 0⋅4 0⋅9 ± 0⋅2 0⋅6 ± 0⋅5 1⋅2 ± 0⋅6 0⋅411 0⋅388 0⋅040
 pfkma 0⋅7 ± 0⋅3 0⋅9 ± 0⋅4 0⋅369 1⋅0 ± 0⋅2 0⋅6 ± 0⋅2 0⋅6 ± 0⋅4 1⋅0 ± 0⋅5 0⋅865 0⋅873 0⋅019
 pfkmb 1⋅2 ± 0⋅4 0⋅8 ± 0⋅1 0⋅044 1⋅2 ± 0⋅4 1⋅2 ± 0⋅5 0⋅5 ± 0⋅1 0⋅5 ± 0⋅2 <0⋅001 0⋅909 0⋅957
 pkma 0⋅5 ± 0⋅2 0⋅7 ± 0⋅2 0⋅030 1⋅2 ± 0⋅3 1⋅0 ± 0⋅5 0⋅7 ± 0⋅2 1⋅1 ± 0⋅3 0⋅179 0⋅357 0⋅035
1

Two-way ANOVA was used to analyse the effects of dietary stimulus (history), challenging diet (diet) and their interaction (history × diet). One-way ANOVA following Tukey's range test was used to rank the treatment combination groups when the interaction of the factors was statistically significant. Different letters indicate significant differences in the mean values for four combination groups (P < 0⋅05).