Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
. 2020 Sep 21;24:565. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03287-6

Glucocorticoid therapy does not delay viral clearance in COVID-19 patients

Jingjing Ji 1,#, Jinxia Zhang 2,#, Ziyun Shao 3,#, Qifeng Xie 4,#, Li Zhong 5, Zhifeng Liu 1,6,
PMCID: PMC7503440  PMID: 32958060

Dear Editor,

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been a severe challenge worldwide. Accumulating evidence reveals that in COVID-19 patients, inflammatory cell infiltration and cytokine storm are key factors leading to acute lung injury and poor prognosis [1]. Glucocorticoid (GC) was one of the anti-inflammatory medications widely used in critically ill patients. Numerous clinical studies have reported the efficacy of GC in the treatment of coronavirus pneumonia; however, the use of GC in the treatment of critical COVID-19 cases is still controversial [2, 3]. The main concern is that GC treatment may delay the clearance of virus. The current cohort study aimed to determine whether GC therapy would prolong the duration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and SARS-CoV-2 clearance.

This cohort study analyzed clinical data from 684 adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections confirmed through RT-PCR on throat swab samples collected between January and March 2020 from two hospitals in Wuhan, China. All patients received standard treatment including antiviral and oxygen therapy, and symptomatic support. The demographic, laboratory data at admission and discharge, GC treatment, and prognosis of the patients were collected. During the treatment, the throat swab and/or sputum and/or lower respiratory tract samples from confirmed patients were collected and tested by RT-PCR every 2 to 3 days. For the severe and critical patients, the interval between two tests was 4 to 5 days. To avoid false negative results, only patients with three continuously negative tests were considered that they have viral RNA clearance. Therefore, for the patients with negative RT-PCR result, two more samples were collected in the following 2 days, respectively. Among the 684 cases, 202 (29.5%) cases had viral RNA clearance within 14 days after illness onset and 210 (30.7%) cases had viral RNA clearance between 14 and 28 days, and 272 (39.8%) cases had viral RNA clearance over 28 days. There were no differences on the age, gender, and underlying diseases between different groups. The degree of decrease in CD4 T cell and B cell counts on admission was related with the prolonged viral RNA clearance (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographics and laboratory data at admission of patients infected with COVID-19 according to the time to SARS-CoV-2 RNA clearance

Overall (N = 684) ≤ 14 days (N = 202) 14–28 days (N = 210) > 28 days (N = 272) p value
Demographics, clinical characteristics
 Age (years) 61.0 [49.0, 70.0] 62.0 [48.0, 71.0] 60.5 [49.3, 70.0] 61.5 [51.0, 70.3] 0.733
 Gender (%) 0.841
  Male 328 (48.0) 98 (48.5) 103 (49.3) 127 (46.7)
  Female 355 (52.0) 104 (51.5) 106 (50.7) 145 (53.3)
 Clinical type (%) 0.009
  Mild 26 (3.9) 16 (8.0) 7 (3.4) 3 (1.1)
  General 464 (69.3) 140 (70.0) 141 (69.1) 183 (68.8)
  Severe 145 (21.6) 36 (18.0) 44 (21.6) 65 (24.4)
  Critical 35 (5.2) 8 (4.0) 12 (5.9) 15 (5.6)
 Hypertension (%) 235 (35.0) 67 (34.0) 70 (33.8) 98 (36.6) 0.778
 CHD (%) 75 (11.2) 22 (11.2) 25 (12.1) 28 (10.4) 0.855
 CRF (%) 16 (2.4) 3 (1.5) 7 (3.4) 6 (2.2) 0.467
 DM (%) 111 (16.5) 30 (15.2) 36 (17.5) 45 (16.8) 0.824
 COPD (%) 13 (1.9) 3 (1.5) 3 (1.4) 7 (2.6) 0.588
 Cirrhosis (%) 3 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.5) 2 (0.7) 0.492
 Stroke (%) 45 (6.7) 14 (7.1) 14 (6.8) 17 (6.3) 0.943
 Tumor (%) 23 (3.4) 5 (2.6) 5 (2.4) 13 (4.9) 0.257
Inflammatory response, median (IQR)
 CRP (mg/L) 7.39 [0.50, 28.25] 8.63 [1.04, 16.33] 5.79 [0.50, 28.80] 5.13 [0.50, 62.39] 0.968
 IL-6 (pg/mL) 6.00 [2.25, 21.00] 6.00 [3.00, 19.50] 7.50 [2.00, 26.25] 6.00 [3.00, 20.50] 0.943
 Fib (g/L) 4.82 [3.68, 11.90] 4.46 [3.58, 11.72] 5.50 [3.65, 11.98] 6.71 [4.08, 13.60] 0.19
 WBC (109/L) 5.59 [4.46, 7.06] 5.60 [4.47, 6.79] 5.51 [4.52, 7.12] 5.33 [4.38, 7.83] 0.962
 Neutrophil (109/L) 3.33 [2.44, 4.76] 3.33 [2.49, 4.51] 3.31 [2.42, 4.85] 3.67 [2.41, 5.83] 0.618
 Monocyte (109/L) 0.46 [0.34, 0.60] 0.45 [0.35, 0.59] 0.46 [0.34, 0.61] 0.47 [0.35, 0.58] 0.970
 Lymphocyte (109/L) 1.27 [0.88, 1.81] 1.29 [0.94, 1.86] 1.29 [0.95, 1.73] 1.00 [0.72, 1.67] 0.204
 PLT (109/L) 203 [158, 249] 209 [156, 267] 196 [158, 241] 189 [148, 244] 0.209
 Hb (g/L) 121 [108, 133] 123 [109, 133] 121 [110, 131] 121 [103, 131] 0.609
 CD3 (count/μL) 8905 [474, 1212] 916 [586, 1220] 705 [423, 1224] 497 [364, 684] 0.115
 CD4 (count/μL) 478 [269, 672] 554 [319, 733] 324 [190, 588] 275 [154, 404] 0.048
 CD8 (count/μL) 248 [150, 374] 291 [174, 400] 229 [142, 367] 167 [123, 211] 0.112
 NK (count/μL) 167 [103, 259] 142 [91.0, 231] 206 [141, 332] 154 [91.8, 215] 0.115
 B cell (count/μL) 175 [104, 281] 195 [131, 296] 187 [91.0, 279] 94.0 [72.8, 126] 0.030
Organ function measurement, median (IQR)
 ALT (U/L) 27.0 [18.0, 41.0] 26.0 [18.0, 40.5] 29.0 [19.0, 43.0] 27.0 [18.3, 38.3] 0.679
 AST (U/L) 22.0 [16.0, 36.5] 20.0 [15.0, 36.0] 23.0 [17.0, 37.0] 23.0 [19.0, 39.0] 0.314
 TBIL (μmol/L) 11.2 [8.40, 14.0] 11.3 [8.7, 14.0] 11.0 [8.30, 13.0] 11.1 [8.53, 15.8] 0.731
 DBIL (μmol/L) 2.80 [2.10, 3.70] 2.70 [2.20, 3.60] 3.00 [1.92, 3.68] 2.90 [1.90, 4.40] 0.935
 Creatinine (μmol/L) 61.0 [50.0, 75.0] 61.0 [50.0, 78.5] 60.0 [50.2, 74.7] 60.0 [50.2, 72.5] 0.694
 BUN (mmol/L) 4.60 [3.60, 5.80] 4.40 [3.50, 5.80] 4.60 [3.70, 5.50] 4.50 [3.70, 5.80] 0.794
 Lactate (mmol/L) 1.10 [1.00, 1.35] 1.00 [0.90, 1.30] 1.10 [1.00, 1.30] 1.10 [1.00, 1.60] 0.395
 Glucose (mmol/L) 5.60 [5.00, 6.62] 5.55 [5.00, 6.32] 5.60 [5.03, 7.62] 5.30 [4.90, 6.95] 0.431
 INR 1.10 [1.00, 1.20] 1.10 [1.00, 1.20] 1.10 [1.00, 1.20] 1.10 [1.10, 1.20] 0.075
 CK (U/L) 66.5 [25.3, 110.5] 67.0 [24.0, 107.5] 62.0 [39.0, 135.0] 63.0 [22.5, 105.5] 0.530
 BNP (pg/mL) 67.9 [28.0, 152.3] 67.9 [28.0, 243.0] 62.0 [27.0, 126.0] 97.0 [41.5, 128.8] 0.490
 NT-proBNP (pg/mL) 745 [88.0, 1899] 109 [67.0, 2679] 1118 [769.5, 2237] 745 [382, 859] 0.532
GC treatment (%) 103 (15.1) 24 (11.9) 32 (15.2) 47 (17.3) 0.266
 Methylprednisolone (%) 96 (14.0) 24 (11.9) 30 (14.3) 42 (15.4) 0.540
 Dexamethasone (%) 12 (1.8) 2 (1.0) 3 (1.4) 7 (2.6) 0.392
 Hydrocortisone (%) 1 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.4) 0.468
Outcome
 Hospital stay (days) 25.0 [16.0, 38.0] 21.0 [14.0, 28.0] 24.0 [18.0, 32.0] 37.0 [21.0, 47.0] < 0.001
 Total course (days) 45.0 [33.0, 59.3] 30.0 [19.5, 39.5] 41.0 [32.0, 54.0] 57.0 [47.0, 67.0] < 0.001
 Outcome (%) 0.414
  Survival 643 (96.8) 191 (97.0) 194 (95.6) 258 (97.7)
  Death 21 (3.2) 6 (3.0) 9 (4.4) 6 (2.3)

Since GC therapy was usually employed in critically ill patients, we analyzed the effect of GC therapy separately for patients with different severity. Patients were diagnosed as mild type, general type, severe type, and critical type according to the Chinese Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Infection (Trial 7th version) [4]. For the mild and general type patients, 30 (6.1%) cases received GC treatment and 460 (93.1%) cases did not. For the severe and critical type patients, 72 (40%) cases were in the GC group and 108 (60%) cases were in the non-GC group (Table 1). In this study, methylprednisolone was the most used glucocorticoid (Table 1) in a dose of 1–2 mg/(kg·day) for 3 to 5 days according to the disease severity [4]. The results show that GC therapy increased hospital stay days but had no effect on the virus clearance time (Table 2). For the severe and critical patients, the median viral RNA clearance time in the GC group was 26 days (IQR 17–42 days), while the viral RNA clearance time in the non-GC group was 25.5 days (IQR 13–39 days). In addition, the GC treatment had no effect on the peripheral lymphocyte counts, including CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, NK cells, and B cells (Table 2).

Table 2.

Effect of glucocorticoid on the outcome and inflammatory response on discharge of COVID-19 patients

Variables Mild and general group Severe and critical group
Non-GC group GC group p value Non-GC group GC group p value
N 460 30 108 72
Hospital stay (days) 23.00 [16.00, 33.00] 32.50 [23.25, 38.00] 0.002 29.00 [17.00, 44.00] 40.50 [31.75, 52.50] < 0.001
Viral RNA clearance (days) 22.00 [11.00, 35.00] 23.50 [14.00, 34.25] 0.737 25.50 [13.00, 39.00] 26.00 [17.00, 42.00] 0.471
Total course (days) 43.00 [29.00, 57.00] 41.00 [31.50, 47.75] 0.816 49.00 [37.50, 63.50] 49.00 [43.00, 63.00] 0.341
Outcome (%) 1 0.555
 Survival 446 (99.8) 30 (100.0) 92 (90.2) 62 (86.1)
 Death 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 10 (9.8) 10 (13.9)
Inflammatory response, median (IQR)
 CRP (mg/L) 2.93 [0.90, 10.00] 4.15 [2.04, 10.50] 0.378 3.19 [0.77, 21.20] 4.59 [1.16, 13.15] 0.457
 IL-6 (pg/mL) 3.00 [2.00, 7.00] 5.00 [2.00, 12.50] 0.253 16.00 [4.75, 36.00] 9.50 [7.25, 32.00] 0.986
 Fib (g/L) 3.58 [2.78, 4.84] 3.96 [3.58, 11.43] 0.227 3.53 [2.84, 14.39] 3.90 [3.60, 10.90] 0.275
 WBC (109/L) 5.55 [4.40, 6.55] 5.20 [4.25, 6.08] 0.568 5.93 [5.00, 7.50] 6.80 [4.90, 8.55] 0.485
 Neutrophil (109/L) 3.17 [2.49, 4.04] 3.05 [2.25, 3.98] 0.641 3.76 [2.85, 5.20] 4.79 [3.09, 6.80] 0.178
 Monocyte (109/L) 0.46 [0.36, 0.57] 0.49 [0.41, 0.66] 0.177 0.43 [0.35, 0.66] 0.51 [0.40, 0.63] 0.311
 Lymphocyte (109/L) 1.56 [1.25, 1.91] 1.47 [1.23, 1.88] 0.801 1.21 [0.97, 1.79] 1.10 [0.85, 1.55] 0.207
 PLT (109/L) 209.0 [173.0, 258.0] 212.0 [183.8, 266.5] 0.923 212.0 [151.0, 236.0] 183.0 [144.0, 250.0] 0.615
 Hb (g/L) 128.5 [117.25, 138.8] 133.0 [127.0, 137.0] 0.667 117.5 [102.5, 129.0] 119.0 [100.0, 125.0] 0.669
 CD3 (count/μL) 1144 [861, 1293] 1002 [793, 1282] 0.791 509 [162.0, 1026] 683.5 [478.8, 1112] 0.508
 CD4 (count/μL) 625.0 [514.0, 831.5] 498.0 [385.0, 801.0] 0.442 306.0 [65.3, 585.5] 338.5 [257.5, 547.0] 0.449
 CD8 (count/μL) 357.0 [246.0, 454.0] 364.0 [248.5, 478.5] 0.845 133.0 [72.3, 341.5] 257.0 [190.3, 389.3] 0.257
 NK (count/μL) 201.0 [128.0, 271.5] 90.0 [55.0, 132.0] 0.008 52.5 [40.0, 124.00] 93.50 [62.5, 117.3] 0.257
 B cell (count/μL) 171.0 [132.5, 265.0] 248.0 [146.0, 328.5] 0.493 68.5 [58.5, 126.8] 115.0 [94.3, 156.0] 0.299

The current multicenter cohort study demonstrates that GC therapy does not change viral clearance and peripheral lymphocyte counts in COVID-19 patients. However, well-designed and large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm the results derived from this observational study.

Acknowledgements

We thank the help from Zheying Liu and Conglin Wang during the data collection, and thank Jie Fan (University of Pittsburgh, USA) for revising the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

All authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Zhifeng Liu was responsible for the study concept and design. Jinxia Zhang, Ziyun Shao, Qifeng Xie, and Li Zhong were responsible for collecting the data. Jingjing Ji, Jinxia Zhang, and Ziyun Shao were responsible for the statistical analysis. Jingjing Ji was responsible for drafting the manuscript. All authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the PLA Logistics Research Project of China [18CXZ030, 17CXZ008]. The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Commission of General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA. The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Ethics Commission.

Consent for publication

All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Jingjing Ji, Jinxia Zhang, Ziyun Shao and Qifeng Xie contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Zhang W, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Wang Q, Li T, Liu Z, et al. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): the perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin Immunol. 2020;214:108393. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fang X, Mei Q, Yang T, Li L, Wang Y, Tong F, et al. Low-dose corticosteroid therapy does not delay viral clearance in patients with COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;81(1):1472020;133(9):1039–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Ling Y, Xu S-B, Lin Y-X, Tian D, Zhu Z-Q, Dai F-H, et al. Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients. Chin Med J. 2020;133(9):1039–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China . Chinese recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus (SARSCoV2) infection (Trial 7th version) 2020. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES