Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 15;11(9):391–399. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v11.i9.391

Table 1.

Follow-up, nature, and presence of standardisation in selected studies

Ref. Number of patients lost to follow up (5) Nature of study Standardisation for comorbidities
Chu et al[12] 17 (6.9) Prospective Standardised
Larrson et al[7] 0 Prospective Not standardised
Schleiffer et al[23] 0 Prospective Standardised
Faglia et al[20] 0 Prospective Standardised
Van Damme et al[13] 0 Prospective Standardised
Goldner et al[5] NS Prospective Standardised
Morbach et al[16] 0 Prospective Standardised
Ghanassia et al[8] 5 (5) Prospective Standardised
Skoutas et al[10] 0 Prospective Standardised
Adler et al[24] 155 (2) Prospective Standardised
Ohsawa et al[25] 0 Prospective Standardised
Izumi et al[9] N/A Retrospective Standardised
Murdoch et al[6] N/A Retrospective Standardised
Uzzaman et al[26] N/A Retrospective Standardised
Acar et al[11] N/A Retrospective Standardised
Nerone et al[17] N/A Retrospective Standardised
Aulivola et al[27] N/A Retrospective Not standardised
Jeyaraman et al[18] N/A Retrospective Standardised
Jeyaraman et al[21] N/A Retrospective Standardised
Thorud et al[15] N/A Meta-analyses Standardised
Albers et al[28] N/A Meta-analyses Standardised
Borkosky et al[14] N/A Systematic Review Standardised

NS: Not specified; N/A: Not applicable.