Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;17(17):6166. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176166

Table 2.

Effect Sizes of the Combined Interventions on Response Inhibition, Set-Shifting, and Complex EFs.

Comparison Outcomes No. of Studies SMD 95% Confidence Interval I2 (%) Homogeneity Test
Q df p
Combined intervention versus Control group Response inhibition 8 0.29 ** 0.10 to 0.48 65.6 20.35 7 0.005
Set-shifting 13 0.24 ** 0.10 to 0.37 34.03 18.19 12 0.11
Complex EFs 8 0.34 ** 0.13 to 0.56 63.67 19.27 7 0.007
Overall 29 0.27 ** 0.17 to 0.37 52.18 58.55 28 0.001
Combined intervention versus Cognitive intervention Response inhibition 9 0.09 −0.09 to 0.26 0 5.16 8 0.74
Set-shifting 5 0.04 * 0.04 to 0.50 0 1.15 4 0.87
Complex EFs 7 0.07 −0.14 to 0.28 0 2.2 6 0.9
Overall 21 0.13 * 0.01 to 0.25 0 10.6 20 0.96
Combined intervention versus Physical intervention Response inhibition 6 0.06 −0.15 to 0.26 33.03 7.47 5 0.19
Set-shifting 4 0.26* 0.01 to 0.52 0 2.04 3 0.56
Complex EFs 5 0.21 −0.04 to 0.46 0 3.56 4 0.47
Overall 15 0.16 0.02 to 0.29 5.43 14.8 14 0.39

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.05.