Table 2.
Comparison | Outcomes | No. of Studies | SMD | 95% Confidence Interval | I2 (%) | Homogeneity Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q | df | p | ||||||
Combined intervention versus Control group | Response inhibition | 8 | 0.29 ** | 0.10 to 0.48 | 65.6 | 20.35 | 7 | 0.005 |
Set-shifting | 13 | 0.24 ** | 0.10 to 0.37 | 34.03 | 18.19 | 12 | 0.11 | |
Complex EFs | 8 | 0.34 ** | 0.13 to 0.56 | 63.67 | 19.27 | 7 | 0.007 | |
Overall | 29 | 0.27 ** | 0.17 to 0.37 | 52.18 | 58.55 | 28 | 0.001 | |
Combined intervention versus Cognitive intervention | Response inhibition | 9 | 0.09 | −0.09 to 0.26 | 0 | 5.16 | 8 | 0.74 |
Set-shifting | 5 | 0.04 * | 0.04 to 0.50 | 0 | 1.15 | 4 | 0.87 | |
Complex EFs | 7 | 0.07 | −0.14 to 0.28 | 0 | 2.2 | 6 | 0.9 | |
Overall | 21 | 0.13 * | 0.01 to 0.25 | 0 | 10.6 | 20 | 0.96 | |
Combined intervention versus Physical intervention | Response inhibition | 6 | 0.06 | −0.15 to 0.26 | 33.03 | 7.47 | 5 | 0.19 |
Set-shifting | 4 | 0.26* | 0.01 to 0.52 | 0 | 2.04 | 3 | 0.56 | |
Complex EFs | 5 | 0.21 | −0.04 to 0.46 | 0 | 3.56 | 4 | 0.47 | |
Overall | 15 | 0.16 | 0.02 to 0.29 | 5.43 | 14.8 | 14 | 0.39 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.05.