Table 3.

Sex-stratified adjusted prevalence ratios for the association between sexual identity and teen dating violence victimization–National Youth Risk Behavior Survey–2015 and 2017

Gender and identity by model	Teen dating violence victimization
	No dating violence		Physical dating violence only		Sexual dating violence only		Both physical and sexual dating violence
	aPR	95% CI	aPR	95% CI	aPR	95% CI	aPR	95% CI
Male students
Model 1 Identity
Heterosexual	Ref	-	Ref	-	Ref	-	Ref	-
Gay	0.78	0.64–0.94	3.32	2.27–4.87	4.04	2.40–6.78	4.60	2.47–8.58
Bisexual	0.86	0.78–0.95	2.54	1.80–3.60	2.86	1.88–4.36	3.09	1.93–4.95
Model 2 Identity
Heterosexual	Ref	-	Ref	-	Ref	-	Ref	-
Gay	0.88	0.77–1.01	2.36	1.40–3.96	2.70	1.43–5.11	2.99	1.43–6.28
Bisexual	0.93	0.87–1.00	1.78	1.18–2.68	1.92	1.19–3.11	2.03	1.19–3.47
Female students
Model 1 Identity
Heterosexual	Ref	-	Ref	-	Ref	-	Ref	-
Lesbian	0.98	0.90–1.05	1.10	0.82–1.46	1.12	0.79–1.58	1.14	0.76–1.70
Bisexual	0.85	0.80–0.90	1.56	1.38–1.76	1.76	1.50–2.07	1.98	1.62–2.42
Model 2 Identity
Heterosexual	Ref	-	Ref	-	Ref	-	Ref	-
Lesbian	1.03	0.95–1.12	0.87	0.57–1.33	0.84	0.51–1.40	0.82	0.45–1.48
Bisexual	0.91	0.86–0.96	1.33	1.14–1.55	1.44	1.18–1.75	1.58	1.23–2.02

aPR adjusted prevalence ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval

Model 1–Adjusted for race and grade

Model 2–Adjusted for race and grade (Model 1), and substance use variables (added in Model 2): current cigarette smoking, current electronic cigarettes, current alcohol use, current marijuana use, and lifetime use of illicit substances (cocaine, heroin, methamphetamines, ecstasy, hallucinogenic drugs, and inhalants)