. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 21.

Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2019 Sep-Oct;40(5):1149–1161. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000691

Table 2.

Comparison of Rapid Phonological Coding Scores and Simple and High-Variability Sentence Recognition Scores

	CI Sample Mean (SD)	NH Sample Mean (SD)	t
Rapid Phonological Coding
Nonword Repetition	27.4 (21.5)	87.7 (9.1)	−19.11^***
Simple Sentence Recognition
Harvard-S	61.4 (27.4)	97.2 (2.8)	−9.70^***
High-Variability Sentence Recognition
PRESTO	48.4 (26.4)	96.0 (4.3)	−13.31^***
PRESTO-FAE	33.0 (19.2)	81.4 (7.4)	−17.44^***

	CI Sample Marginal Mean (SE)	NH Sample Marginal Mean (SE)	F
High-Variability Sentence Recognition Controlling for Simple Sentence Recognition
PRESTO controlling for Harvard-S	66.3 (0.8)	80.4 (0.8)	116.45^***
PRESTO-FAE controlling for Harvard-S	44.8 (1.4)	71.0 (1.3)	143.55^***

Note: Values are scores for % of nonwords (for Nonword Repetition) or % of keywords (for sentence recognition tests) correct. CI, cochlear implant; NH, normal-hearing; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; df for t tests = 103; corrected df for ANCOVAs = 2, 104

Significant values after Holm-Bonferroni correction are indicated by

^***

p ≤ 0.001

^**

p ≤ 0.01

p ≤ 0.05.