. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 21.

Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2019 Sep-Oct;40(5):1149–1161. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000691

Table 4.

Correlations Between Executive Functioning Scores and Rapid Phonological Coding and High-Variability Sentence Recognition Scores

	CI Sample				NH Sample
	Executive Functioning
	VWM^a	SWM^b	CCF^c	I-C^d	VWM^a	SWM^b	CCF^c	I-C^d
Rapid Phonological Coding
Nonword Repetition	.37	.22	.21	−.01	.16	.03	−.12	.23
Simple Sentence Recognition
Harvard-S	.37	.08	.12	−.12	.36	.12	.05	.04
High-Variability Sentence Recognition
PRESTO	.39	.13	.15	−.10	.23	.06	−.01	.01
PRESTO-FAE	.30	.16	.18	−.12	−.04	−.02	−.06	−.16

Note: CI, cochlear implant; NH, normal-hearing; r values are Pearson correlation coefficients.

Verbal Working Memory

Spatial Working Memory

Controlled Cognitive Fluency

Inhibition-Concentration

Only significant values after Holm-Bonferroni correction are indicated by

^***

p ≤ 0.001

^**

p ≤ 0.01

p ≤ 0.05