Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb 21;15(5):274–282. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2018.10

Table 2 |.

Performance of elastography modalities in patients with NAFLD

Study n Mean BMI (kg/m2) Failure and/or unreliable rate (%)a Patients with advanced (F3-F4) fibrosis (%) AUROC for F3-F4 Optimal cut-off for F3-F4 Sensitivity/specificity Refs
VCTE
Chen 111 40.3 22.7 20 0.87 7.6 kPa (M and XL) 84/64 23
Tapper 164 32.3 27 18 0.93 9.9 kPa 95/77 20
Park 104 30.4 6.7 17 0.8 7.3 kPa (M and XL) 78/78 18
Boursier 588 31.7 9.3 39 0.83 8.7 kPa 88/63 16
Imajo 142 28.1 10.5 32 0.88 11.4 kPa 86/84 22
Petta 324 39.5% >30 NA 35 0.86 10.1 kPa 78/78 54
Cassinottob 291 60.1% >30.0 23.4 43 0.86 8.2 and 12.5 kPa 90/61 and 57/90 19
Kumar 120 26.1 14.9 23 0.94 9.0 kPa 85/88 55
Chan 153 29.4 3.9 21 NA 8.0 kPa 95/66 56
Aykut 88 30.3 NA 41 0.94 7.9 kPa 96/90 57
Naveau 100 42.3 19 9 0.85 7.6 kPa 100/74 58
Gaia 72 27.5 NA 34 0.76 8.0 kPa 65/80 59
Mahadeva 131 32.8% >30.0 8 22 0.77 7.1 kPa 70/67 60
Wong 193 28.9 25 30 0.78 (ITT) and 0.85 (PP) 7.2 kPa (XL) 74/75 (ITT) and 78/78 21
Wong 246 28.5% >30.0 10.2 23 0.93 8.7 kPa (PP) 84/83 61
MRE
Chen 111 40.3 4.5 20 0.92 3.6 kPa 84/83 23
Park 104 30.4 0 17 0.87 3.0 kPa 78/80 18
Loomba 100 32.1 0 15 0.92 3.8 kPa 80/95 36
Imajo 142 28.1 0 32 0.89 4.8 kPa 75/87 22
Loomba 117 32.4 0 19 0.92 3.6 kPa 82/90 37
Cui 102 31.7 0 19 0.96 3.6 kPa 92/90 39
ARFI
Cassinotto 291 60.1% >30.0 19 43 0.84 1.15 and 1.53 m/s 90/63 and 59/90 19
Cui 125 31.8 2.4 17 0.9 1.34 m/s 95/74 31
Palmeri 172 68.6% >30.0 21.5 33 0.9 4.24 kPa (2.06 m/s) 90/90 32
SWE
Cassinotto 291 60.1% >30.0 20.3 43 0.89 8.3 and 10.7 kPa 91/71 and 71/90 19
Ochi 181 26.5 NA 28 0.88 3.02c 89/97 62

All relevant studies with >50 patients with NAFLD were included in this table. Some studies provided only the proportion of patients with BMI >30 kg/m2.

a

Failure and unreliable rates for VCTE studies are combined in this column; reliability criteria have not yet been determined for MRE, SWE or ARFI.

b

Used two cut-offs to maximize sensitivity and specificity.

c

Study used elastic ratio (the ratio of strain distribution in two selected regions of interest). ARFI, acoustic radiation force imaging; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic; ITT; intention to treat; MRE, magnetic resonance elastography; NA, not available; PP, per protocol; SWE, shear-wave elastography; VCTE, vibration-controlled transient elastography.