Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 22;98:106742. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106742

Table 8.

A comparison between the results of the proposed approach and the best results achieved by the other proposed approaches listed in [14], [15], [16], [17], [19].

Approach Number of original samples Number of classes Accuracy Average
precision
Average
Recall
Average
F score
MobileNet [14] 224 COVID-19
504 Healthy
714 Pneumonia (400 bacterial + 314 viral)
2 classes 96.78% 96.46% 98.66%

DarkCovidNet [15] 125 COVID-19
500 No- Findings
2 classes 98.08%. 98.03% 95.13% 96.51%

DarkCovidNet [15] 125 COVID-19
500 No- Findings
500 Pneumonia
3 classes 87.02% 89.96% 85.35% 87.37%

CNN-SA [16] 403 COVID-19
721 Normal
2 classes 95% 95% 95% 95%

CoroNet [17] 284 COVID-19
310 Normal
330 Pneumonia Bacterial
327 Pneumonia Viral
4 classes 89.6% 90% 89.92% 89.8%

CoroNet [17] 284 COVID-19
310 Normal
657 Pneumonia (330 bacterial + 327 viral)
3 classes 95% 95% 96.9% 95.6%

CoroNet [17] 284 COVID-19
310 Normal
2 classes 99% 98.3% 99.3% 98.5%

Deep Bayes-SqueezeNet [19] 76 COVID-19
4290 Pneumonia (bacterial + viral)
1583 Normal
3 classes 98.3% 98.3% 98.3% 98.3%

Proposed
GSA-DenseNet121-COVID-19
99 COVID-19
11 SARS
4 ARDS
6 Pneumocystis
2 Streptococcus
104 Healthy
80 pneumonia
2 classes 98.38% 98.5% 98.5% 98%