Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 22;21:804. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04728-x

Table 5.

Acceptability and feasibility definitions and benchmarks

Definition Benchmark
Aspects of acceptability being measured (adapted from Sekhon et al. [38])
 Burden Discontinuation/non-attendance < 20% of TCQ and the SQG condition will drop out at 3 months follow-up.
 Ethical consequences Any side effects with intervention < 10% of participants will report any physical soreness or difficulties in doing TCQ.
 Experience Participant’s experience and satisfaction > 80% TCQ participants will perceive intervention positively.
> 80% TCQ participants will rate it very satisfactory or satisfactory.
 Affective attitudes Participants attitudes toward the intervention > 80% of participant in TCQ condition will report positive attitudes about it (very good/good).
 Opportunity costs Adherence and participation Participants in both TCQ and SQG conditions will attend at least 75% of all sessions.
Participants in the TCQ condition will adhere to home practice at least 75% of the time expected (i.e., 112 out of 150 min/week).
 Intentions Willingness to participate > 80% TCQ participants would be willing to participate again.
> 80% TCQ participants intend to continue qigong practice.
Aspects of feasibility being measured (adapted from Bowen et al. [39])
 Demand Likelihood that intervention will be used > 80% of TCQ participants will report any TCQ practice in the past week.
 Implementation Can the intervention be implemented in a setting, often a real-world setting Trainers will execute intervention > 80% of the time.
> 80% of trainers will rate resources needed to implement as very good/good.
> 80% of trainers will report positive effects on population.
 Practicality Extent to which an intervention can be delivered given the limited resources > 80% of trainers will report participant’s ability to do the intervention as very good/good.
 Integration Extent to which the intervention fits the system > 80% of trainers will perceive intervention fits the clinic infrastructure as very good/good.
> 80% of trainers perceive the sustainability of the intervention as very good/good.