Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 15;6(4):226–237. doi: 10.1159/000504984

Table 2.

MTS-associated periocular sebaceous neoplasms: survey responders

Ophthalmic pathologists, n (%) Ocular oncologists, n (%) Oculoplastic surgeons, n (%)
Practice location
 USA 28/56 (50) 28/56 (50) 8/31 (26) 13/16 (81)
 Europe 11/56 (20) 3/31 (10) 0/16 (0)
 Canada 2/56 (3.5) 2/31 (6) 1/16 (6)
 Asia 6/56 (11) 8/31 (26) 0/16 (0)
 Australia 3/56 (5) 3/31 (10) 1/16 (6)
 Central/South America 4/56 (7) 5/31 (16) 1/16 (6)
 Other 2/56 (3.5) 2/31 (6) 0/16 (0)
Practice type Eye pathology/ Ophthalmology hospital 39/56 (70) 20/31 (65) 1/16 (6)
 General pathology/ Oncology/plastics hospital 10/56 (18) 5/31 (16) 3/16 (19)
 Private practice 2/56 (3) 4/31 (13) 12/16 (75)
 Other 5/56 (9) 2/31 (6) 0/16 (0)
Are MTS screening guidelines for patients with periocular sebaceous neoplasia clear?
 Extremely clear 6/55 (11) 4/31 (13) 2/16 (12)
 Somewhat clear 23/55 (42) 8/31 (26) 6/16 (38)
 Not so clear 18/55 (33) 16/31 (51) 6/16 (38)
 Not at all clear 8/55 (14) 3/31 (10) 2/16 (12)

MTS, Muir-Torre Syndrome.