Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;20(17):4940. doi: 10.3390/s20174940

Table 4.

The results of the classification models based on fusion strategies.

Fusion Strategy Models Cal Val Pre
measurement fusion SVM 99.903 ± 0.069 b 99.147 ± 0.378 b 99.535 ± 0.324 a
LR 99.852 ± 0.029 b 99.612 ± 0.137 a 99.690 ± 0.402 a
CNN 99.981 ± 0.018 a 99.845 ± 0.087 a 99.922 ± 0.174 a
PCA feature fusion SVM 99.897 ± 0.058 b 99.186 ± 0.373 b 99.535 ± 0.324 a
LR 99.987 ± 0.029 a 99.961 ± 0.087 a 99.767 ± 0.318 a
CNN 99.936 ± 0.076 ab 99.031 ± 0.565 b 99.457 ± 0.162 a
deep feature fusion SVM 100.000 ± 0.000 a 99.922 ± 0.174 a 99.922 ± 0.106 a
LR 99.987 ± 0.018 a 99.845 ± 0.162 a 99.922 ± 0.106 a
CNN 99.981 ± 0.029 a 99.884 ± 0.260 a 99.922 ± 0.106 a

The letters (a, b) in each column indicate the significance of the difference in the accuracy of different models at the confidence level of 5%. Within a column, data followed by different letters are significantly different.