Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;24(3):233–259. doi: 10.1177/1088868320914208

Table 4.

Moderator Analyses, Study 1.

Moderators b SE p 95% CI QE p for QE
Emotional impact scores 0.13 0.04 <.001 [0.05, 0.21] 197.45 <.001
Year of publication/appearance −0.01 0.004 <.001 [−0.02, −0.007] 185.09 <.001
Vividness
(1 = audiovisual, 0 = text)
0.30 0.12 .014 [0.06, 0.54] 214.96 <.001
Proximity
(1 =
proximal, 0 = distal)
0.60 0.15 <.001 [0.31, 0.90] 184.68 <.001
Veracity
(1 = real, 0 = hypothetical)
0.12 0.12 .31 [−0.11, 0.36] 204.29 <.001
Publication status
(1 = published, 0 = unpublished)
0.26 0.12 .036 [0.02, 0.50] 216.87 <.001
Sample size −0.001 0.001 .054 [−0.003, .0000] 208.20 <.001

Note. Each moderator was analyzed individually. Degrees of freedom for QE equal 53 for all moderators except for veracity (df = 51). QE = test for residual heterogeneity.