Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;7(1):e563. doi: 10.1002/ams2.563

Table 2.

Summary of findings of a systematic review of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone for septic shock

Outcomes No. of studies No. of patients Effect estimates Certainty in effect estimates Certainty assessment
HC + FC Control Relative effect Absolute effect
(95% CI) (95% CI)
28‐day mortality 2 289/764 (37.8%) 335/776 (43.2%) RR 0.88 52 fewer per 1,000 ⨁⨁⨁⨁
(0.78 to 0.99) (4 fewer to 95 fewer) High
Long‐term mortality (90 days to 1 year) 3 478/1,009 (47.4%) 548/1,040 (52.7%) RR 0.90 53 fewer per 1,000 ⨁⨁⨁⨁
(0.83 to 0.98) (11 fewer to 90 fewer) High
Shock reversal (at day 28) 1 603/761 (79.2%) 569/775 (73.4%) RR 1.06 44 more per 1,000 ⨁⨁⨁ Imprecision
(1.01 to 1.12) (7 more to 88 more) Moderate
Superinfection 3 266/1,009 (26.4%) 242/1,039 (23.3%) RR 1.14 33 more per 1,000 ⨁⨁ Borderline inconsistency and imprecision
(0.85 to 1.51) (35 fewer to 119 more) Low
GI bleeding 2 50/764 (6.5%) 53/775 (6.8%) RR 0.96 3 fewer per 1,000 ⨁⨁ Serious imprecision
(0.66 to 1.39) (23 fewer to 27 more) Low
Hyperglycemia 3 547/614 (89.1%) 520/626 (83.1%) RR 1.07 58 more per 1,000 ⨁⨁⨁⨁
(1.03 to 1.12) (25 more to 100 more) High
Psychiatric disorders 3 0/150 (0.0%) 1/149 (0.7%) RR 0.33 4 fewer per 1,000 ⨁⨁ Serious imprecision
(0.01 to 8.06) (6 fewer to 47 more) Low

CI, confidential interval; FC, fludrocortisone; GI, gastrointestinal; HC, hydrocortisone; RR, risk ratio.

Certainty in effect estimates was assessed with five domains: study limitations, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias.