Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 22;8(10):E1321–E1331. doi: 10.1055/a-1221-4922

Table 1. Summary of characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author,
year
Study type Country Number of study sites Endoscopists (N = ), specialty, practice type Colonoscopies (N = ) pre-/post- intervention Patient sex (% male) Median patient age Indication (% screening-related) Study quality
Berger 2017 33 OBS USA 1 11, 100 % GI, academic 1,113/849 N/R N/R N/R N/A *
Coe 2013 27 RCT USA 1 15, 100 % GI, academic 602/520 51 63 42 NOS-8
Corley 2019 32 OBS USA 20 85, specialty N/R, setting N/R 12,266/20,897 49 63 22 N/A *
Evans 2019 34 OBS Canada 1 14, specialty N/R, academic 833/850
Hall 2010 31 OBS USA 1 11, 100 % GI, academic 550/413 48 53 100 N/A *
Kaminski 2016 29 RCT Poland 38 38, specialty N/R, setting: National CRC Screening Program 14,264/10,615 39 57 100 NOS-9
Keswani 2015 30 OBS USA 1 20, specialty N/R, setting N/R 2,444/3,639 N/R N/R 100 NOS-8
Wallace 2017 28 RCT USA 9 N/R 7,480/8,673 59 47 70 NOS-8

OBS, observational study; RCT, randomized controlled trial; GI, gastroenterologist; Sx, surgeon; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale 21 ; N/R = not reported

*

conference abstract.