Table 1a.
Cox regression analyses for progression-free survival in the overall analysis group, showing hazard ratios for CDK4/6i + ET versus ET.
| Setting | Unadjusted analysis |
First adjusted analysis a |
Second adjusted analysis b |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| First line | 0.81 (0.54, 1.22) | 0.32 | 0.87 (0.56, 1.34) | 0.52 | 0.87 (0.58, 1.32) | 0.52 |
| Second line | 1.04 (0.72, 1.50) | 0.84 | 0.90 (0.60, 1.35) | 0.61 | 0.84 (0.57, 1.24) | 0.39 |
| Third line | 0.96 (0.60, 1.54) | 0.86 | 0.85 (0.50, 1.43) | 0.53 | 0.83 (0.51, 1.35) | 0.45 |
CDK4/6i, CDK4/6 inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; ET, endocrine therapy; HR, hazard ratio.
HRs were adjusted for age, time from primary diagnosis to metastasis, ECOG, grade, anti-endoctrine therapy, metastasis pattern, number of previous chemotherapies (at Setting 2 and 3), number of comorbidities.
HRs were obtained after variable selection process. At setting 1 the predictor anti-endocrine therapy were selected. At setting 2 age, metastasis pattern and number of previous chemotherapies were selected. At Setting 3, time from primary diagnosis to metastasis and number of comorbidities were selected.