Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 18;13(12):100870. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100870

Table 3.

Characteristics of patients treated with MBRT.

Age Location Histological subtype Genomic alteration MBRT initiated Clinical trial PFS (m) Best response OS (m)
57 Limbs Leiomyosarcoma AKT2 amplification Everolimus MOST 2.6 Progression 10.9
47 Trunk MPNST ERBB2 mutation c.G2329T/p.V777L Lapatinib MOST 1.9 Stable 3.8
79 Limbs Angiosarcoma FLT4 amplification Pazopanib MOST 3.1 Partial response 10.7
30 Limbs UPS AKT2 19q13.1-q13.2 deletion Everolimus 1.4 Progression 4.1
13 Limbs Osteosarcoma KDR amplification Regorafenib BAY15906
Phase I
1.9 Progression 3.1
20 Limbs Osteosarcoma VEGFA amplification Sorafenib 2.3 Progression 2.8
21 Limbs Osteosarcoma PIK3CA amplification Everolimus MOST 2.7 Progression 11
43 Trunk Osteosarcoma CDK4 amplification Ribociclib LEE011
Phase I
1.7 Progression 6.1
31 Limbs Ewing sarcoma TIE1 mutation c.G1379C/p.S460T Sorafenib 3.6 Stable 7.4
58 Limbs Chondrosarcoma KDR mutation c.3380C>A Sorafenib 33.6 Stable 39.6
58 Abdominal GIST CDKN2A homozygous deletion Palbociclib 0.8 Progression 4.9
66 Abdominal GIST CDKN2A homozygous deletion Palbociclib CycliGIST 0.9 Progression 2.6
80 Abdominal GIST CDKN2A homozygous deletion Palbociclib CycliGIST 3.7 Stable 22.9